Cultural Theory and Popular Culture
Cultural Theory and Popular Culture
Cultural Theory and Popular Culture
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
238<br />
Notes<br />
16. The film Human Nature presents a very funny staging of this idea. Freud (1985) uses the<br />
volcanic irruption at Pompeii in AD 55 as a means to explain repression <strong>and</strong> how to undo its<br />
work: ‘There is, in fact, no better analogy for repression, by which something in the mind is<br />
at once made inaccessible <strong>and</strong> preserved, than burial of the sort to which Pompeii fell a<br />
victim <strong>and</strong> from which it could emerge once more through the work of spades’ (65).<br />
17. In the original German, ego, super-ego <strong>and</strong> id are Ich (I), über-Ich (over-I) <strong>and</strong> es (it).<br />
18. The manner in which Freud discusses the girl’s experience of the Oedipus complex, especially<br />
the language he uses, seems to suggest that a real underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the process was not very<br />
important to him.<br />
19. It should also be noted that Freud (1977) believed there were two ways to navigate the<br />
Oedipus complex: ‘positive’, which resulted in heterosexuality, <strong>and</strong> ‘negative’, which produces<br />
homosexuality. A boy may ‘take the place of his mother <strong>and</strong> be loved by his father’ (318).<br />
20. ‘As a witty poet remarks so rightly, the mirror would do well to reflect a little more before<br />
returning our image to us’ (Lacan, 1989: 152).<br />
21. For Brechtian aesthetics, see Brecht (1978).<br />
22. Barthes’s ‘Myth today’ <strong>and</strong> Williams’s ‘The analysis of culture’ are two of the founding texts<br />
of British cultural studies.<br />
23. Barthes’s formulation is remarkably similar to the concept of ‘interpellation’ developed by<br />
Louis Althusser some years later (see discussion in Chapter 4).<br />
24. Myth works in much the same way as Foucault’s concept of power; it is productive (see later<br />
in this chapter).<br />
25. See hyperlink: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6108496.stm<br />
26. If you enter Jeremy Kyle in the search engine on YouTube you will find Jon Culshaw’s wonderful<br />
parody. Culshaw quite brilliantly captures the agression, the discourse of social class<br />
<strong>and</strong> the smug self-satisfaction of this type of programme.<br />
27. Mulvey’s essay has been anthologized at least ten times.<br />
28. Based on a diagram in Dyer (1999: 376).<br />
29. Charlotte Lamb, originally in The Guardian, 13 September 1982 (quoted in Coward, 1984: 190).<br />
30. Janice Radway finds this figure implausible.<br />
31. In similar fashion, it may be the case that reading Enid Blyton’s Secret Seven books as a child<br />
– with their imperative of collective action – prepared the ground for my commitment to<br />
socialism as an adult.<br />
32. See Bennett (1983) <strong>and</strong> Storey (1992).<br />
33. Antony died in December 1999. I knew him both as a teacher <strong>and</strong> as a colleague. Although<br />
I often disagreed with him, his influence on my work (<strong>and</strong> on the work of others) has been<br />
considerable.<br />
34. Butler (1999) uses the term ‘heterosexual matrix’ ‘to designate that grid of cultural intelligibility<br />
through which bodies, genders, <strong>and</strong> desires are naturalized. ...[This is] a hegemonic<br />
discursive/epistemic model of gender intelligibility that assumes that for bodies to cohere<br />
<strong>and</strong> make sense there must be a stable sex expressed through a stable gender (masculine<br />
expresses male, feminine expresses female) that is oppositionally <strong>and</strong> hierarchically defined<br />
through the compulsory practice of heterosexuality’ (194).<br />
35. Esther Newton (1999), whose work on drag is used by Butler, makes the point that ‘children<br />
learn sex-role identity before they learn any strictly sexual object choices. In other words,<br />
I think that children learn they are boys or girls before they are made to underst<strong>and</strong> that<br />
boys only love girls <strong>and</strong> vice versa’ (108). Harold Beaver (1999) writes, ‘What is “natural” is<br />
neither heterosexual nor homosexual desire but simply desire. . . . Desire is like the pull of a<br />
gravitational field, the magnet that draws body to body’ (161).