26.07.2013 Views

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Furthermore, election studies holds a prominent place in communication scholarship, as McCombs<br />

and Shaw studied agenda setting in the American presidential election of 1968, Yiengar, Kinder and<br />

Peters used elections to demonstrate the value of ―priming,‖ and Entman recently applied the<br />

concept of ―framing‖ to election research in the United States. 503<br />

Additionally, Strömbäck and Dimitrova‘s analysis of Swedish and American media also focus on<br />

elections since these periods are ―highly amenable to cross-national political communication<br />

comparison,‖ and more idealistically perhaps because ―news coverage of election campaigns is<br />

essential for voters.‖ 504 Thus the large body of election research available to contextualize results of<br />

a comparison between Danish and American news coverage makes election periods a natural<br />

foundation for the present content analysis.<br />

Concerning the current study‘s chronology, Esser, Reinemann and Fan, as noted in chapter 2, argue<br />

that an important shift has taken place in the news media between the 1960‘s and present-day<br />

political campaigns which makes the 1968 election between Richard Nixon and Hubert Humphrey<br />

the point of origin for subsequent analysis. According to the Esser, Reinemann and Fan, ―issue<br />

coverage‖ combined with a ―descriptive style of reporting‖ was prevalent in the press during the<br />

1960s, but in the following decade an important shift took place,<br />

―In the 1970s, the distribution of media coverage changed fundamentally from issue-based<br />

stories to stories that emphasize who is ahead and behind, and the strategies and tactics of<br />

campaigning‖ 505<br />

Additionally, Esser, Reinemann and Fan see the ―1988 U.S. presidential election‖ as a ―watershed<br />

for a third stage of political journalism,‖ namely metacoverage, where the press, ―self referentially<br />

503<br />

McCombs and Shaw, "<strong>The</strong> Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media." See also Iyengar, Peters, and Kinder,<br />

"Experimental Demonstrations of the 'Not-So-Minimal' Consequences of Television News Programs." As well as<br />

Entman, "Media Framing Biases and Political Power: Explaining Slant in News of Campaign 2008." Also Blumler and<br />

McQuail, "Political Communication Scholarship: <strong>The</strong> Uses of Election Research." Page 232-236.<br />

504<br />

Strömbäck and Dimitrova, "Political and Media Systems Matter: A Comparison of Election News Coverage in<br />

Sweden and the United States." Page 131-132.<br />

505<br />

Esser, Reinemann, and Fan, "Spin Doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany: Metacommunication<br />

About Media Manipulation." Page 16-17.<br />

164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!