26.07.2013 Views

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

experience as a visiting scholar in Europe and backs it up with four or five other individual account<br />

in the footnotes, but rarely is a survey or a broader study used to enhance the assertion of a<br />

representative argument. 67<br />

Holm, 1999<br />

In her study ―American Influence on Danish TV <strong>Journalism</strong>,‖ Nancy Graham Holm argues that<br />

endogeneous forces as much as exogeneous forces have shaped the development of Danish<br />

television from 1990 to 1999 and that while ―Danish TV journalism has changed fundamentally in<br />

the last ten years it is not a direct result of American influence.‖ 68<br />

Utilizing questionnaires and qualitative interviews with Danish journalists, Holm nevertheless<br />

admits that ―it is difficult to measure America‘s influence on Danish TV journalism,‖ and does not<br />

attempt to define or operationalize Americanization any further. Despite Holm‘s description of the<br />

difficulties in measuring American influence, the author finds that changes have been taking place<br />

with increased speed after 1988 when the Danish Broadcasting Service no longer was the sole actor<br />

on the Danish TV market. <strong>The</strong>reby, Holm implicitly argues the importance of commercialization<br />

and deregulation in transforming the Danish media market.<br />

According to Holm, the changes ascribed to Danish TV journalism are not exclusively the result of<br />

American influence, but these developments are ―a response to competition, changes in technology<br />

and globalization. (…) It is incorrect, therefore, to say that America is responsible.‖ 69 Despite her<br />

argument that media markets are mostly shaped by endogeneous forces, Holm‘s text does not seem<br />

to reflect over differences within the countries she describes. On the contrary, Americans ―thrive on<br />

innovation,‖ Danes ―do not like change,‖ some Danes prefer a growing trend towards populism,<br />

while Danish intellectuals ―have a tendency to prefer the elitist‖ public service model for television.<br />

Holm sees the Danish adherence to public service as an important counterforce of American<br />

influence especially combined with Danish aversion to change.<br />

―[I]n spite of market forces, techonology and globalization, there has been strong resistance to<br />

outside influence. In spite of America‘s enormous power to influence, there is one<br />

67 Ibid. Page 145-151.<br />

68 Nancy Graham Holm, "American Influence on Danish TV <strong>Journalism</strong>," Update (1999),<br />

http://www.update.dk/cfje/VidBase.nsf/ID/VB00140562. Article accessed July 11, 2008. Page 12.<br />

69 Ibid. Holm does, however, point out that ―the electronic teleprompter, used in American [sic] since the 70s was<br />

introduced to Danish TV news only in the 1990s.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!