26.07.2013 Views

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Yet, the relatively infrequent use of the personalization frame among American and Danish political<br />

reporters means that the results are not statistically significant. USA Today once again goes against<br />

the overall tendency of <strong>The</strong> New York Times and Los Angeles Times‘ coverage between 1968 and<br />

2008. For USA Today there is clearly a decline in the use of personalization frames from 1988 until<br />

2008, which fits well with the newspapers pronounced focus on hard news from the early 1990‘s<br />

and forward as mentioned above. Also for the Danish news outlets is an uneven trend of<br />

personalization coverage apparent. Ekstra Bladet focuses most on the personal characteristics of<br />

politicians, but also here, as within the American outlets, the coverage peaks in 1988.<br />

Percent<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Personalization frame<br />

1971 1981 1990 2001<br />

Table 21 - Percentage of personalization frame in Danish news coverage between 1971 and 2001.<br />

<strong>The</strong> lack of personalization frames in Danish election coverage corresponds well with research from<br />

Germany, where Esser finds that, there has only been slight to no significant rise in personalization<br />

coverage, though an increase in personalization coverage would be assumed, if one expects an<br />

increasing tendency towards tabloidization, which Esser defines as, ―the direct result of<br />

187<br />

Politiken<br />

Berlingske Tidende<br />

Ekstra Bladet

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!