26.07.2013 Views

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

The Jeremiad Over Journalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> third chapter, relating to structural Americanization, meaning ―economic, technological,<br />

political‖ factors, 19 constitutes a critical overview of the American government‘s aims in regards to<br />

the military, economic and technological policy towards Denmark. Here I argue, that Denmark had<br />

some leverage in relation to the United States because of country‘s geographical importance to<br />

NATO‘s defense. Moreover, I demonstrate that the American ―first amendment absolutism,‖ calling<br />

for no government regulation of the media market, is at odds with Danish politicians‘ perspective<br />

that the press is worthy of subsidies because it serves a democratizing purpose in society.<br />

Nevertheless, this chapter also shows that the Danish media environment has become more<br />

commercialized over the years, though this commercialization has of yet not had a tangible<br />

influence on election coverage. Additionally, the third chapter reveals that there was great demand<br />

for American technological products after World War II among Danish journalists a fact that lends<br />

empirical support to the notion that some aspects of Americanization occurred by invitation instead<br />

of imperialism.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fourth chapter, focused on symbolic Americanization, meaning ―culture, ideology and<br />

institutions,‖ 20 shows that the American government very actively, both covertly and overtly,<br />

attempted to influence Danish journalism after World War II through transmission of cultural<br />

products. I examine, the aims of the USIA, its own assessment of results, and Danish skepticism<br />

over the Central Intelligence Agency‘s work in Scandinavia. Additionally, it is demonstrated that<br />

the transnational exchange programs initiated by the United States government and private<br />

organizations in Denmark had lasting effects on the students and scholars who went and gave these<br />

students a more positive view of the United States than was the case before the exchange. <strong>The</strong><br />

experience for some also exposed the differences between the Scandinavian and American media<br />

systems while creating an important international network for their future work and for some<br />

impacted their journalistic practice. Lastly, the chapter demonstrates that Danish journalists were<br />

aware of the commercial pitfalls espoused by the American media system, but at the same time<br />

appropriated journalistic practices emanating from America. In very real ways, the United States<br />

was seen by Danish journalists as the place to discover the future of journalism and the last part of<br />

this chapter, heeding Hallin and Mancini‘s suggestion, offers two concrete examples of how<br />

19 Elteren, Americanism and Americanization: A Critical History of Domestic and Global Influence. Page 129.<br />

20 Ibid. Page 142. See also Joseph S. Nye, <strong>The</strong> Paradox of American Power: Why <strong>The</strong> World's Only Superpower Can't<br />

Go It Alone (New York Oxford University Press, 2002). Page 9-11.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!