29.07.2013 Views

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1-1: Proportion <strong>of</strong> respondents who hunted for small game in the <strong>Minnesota</strong> farmland zone<br />

during the past 5 years<br />

% <strong>of</strong> hunters 1 indicating they hunted in the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

farmland zone in past 5 years<br />

Region <strong>of</strong> residence n Yes No<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide 2 823 72.0% 28.0%<br />

METRO 357 77.3% 22.7%<br />

NONMETRO 507 68.0% 32.0%<br />

χ 2 = 8.893**; Cramer’s V = 0.101<br />

1 A stratified sample based on region <strong>of</strong> residence was drawn. <strong>State</strong>wide data is weighted to reflect metropolitan/nonmetropolitan<br />

proportions in the population and to correct for non-response bias.<br />

n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001<br />

Table 1-2: Percentage <strong>of</strong> hunters who hunt for specific types <strong>of</strong> small game in <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Pheasant Grouse Woodcock Snipe/Rail Dove Rabbits Squirrel<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide 67.8% 58.3% 12.6% 3.2% 10.6% 24.0% 24.5%<br />

METRO 71.3% 62.1% 15.3% 3.7% 8.9% 15.5% 20.0%<br />

NONMETRO 64.0% 55.6% 11.5% 2.9% 11.7% 27.8% 26.3%<br />

χ 2 = 5.449*;<br />

CV = 0.077<br />

χ 2 = 3.931*;<br />

CV = 0.065<br />

χ 2 = 2.772 n.s.;<br />

CV = 0.055<br />

χ 2 = 0.413 n.s.;<br />

CV = 0.021<br />

χ 2 = 1.797 n.s.;<br />

CV = 0.044<br />

χ 2 = 19.176***;<br />

CV = 0.144<br />

1 A stratified sample based on region <strong>of</strong> residence was drawn. <strong>State</strong>wide data is weighted to reflect metropolitan/nonmetropolitan<br />

proportions in the population and to correct for non-response bias.<br />

n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001<br />

Table 1-3: Average number <strong>of</strong> days hunting for specific types <strong>of</strong> small game in <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

χ 2 = 4.957*;<br />

CV = 0.073<br />

Pheasant Grouse Woodcock Snipe/Rail Dove Rabbits Squirrel<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide 8.4 8.2 8.1 6.2 5.8 7.5 7.2<br />

METRO 9.2 5.9 6.8 6.1 6.0 8.1 7.7<br />

NONMETRO 6.9 9.4 8.7 6.6 5.6 7.5 7.4<br />

F=6.238*;<br />

η=0.111<br />

F=20.882***;<br />

η=0.195<br />

F=0.699 n.s.;<br />

η=0.069<br />

F=0.249 n.s.;<br />

η=0.063<br />

F=0.127 n.s.;<br />

η=0.034<br />

F=0.005 n.s.;<br />

η=0.005<br />

1 A stratified sample based on region <strong>of</strong> residence was drawn. <strong>State</strong>wide data is weighted to reflect metropolitan/nonmetropolitan<br />

proportions in the population and to correct for non-response bias.<br />

n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001<br />

194<br />

F=0.004 n.s.;<br />

η=0.004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!