2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

Section 5: Environmental Values
Table 5-22: I am concerned about environmental problems because of the consequences for:
FUTURE GENERATIONS
N
Not at all
important
Extremely
important
Statewide 1 854 1.7% 1.3% 2.5% 9.5% 12.7% 24.7% 47.7% 6.0
METRO 366 1.4% 0.8% 1.9% 9.8% 11.5% 24.6% 50.0% 6.0
NONMETRO 525 1.7% 1.5% 2.5% 8.8% 12.8% 24.0% 48.8% 6.0
χ 2 =1.998 n.s., Cramer’s V=0.047
1 A stratified sample based on region of residence was drawn. Statewide data is weighted to reflect metropolitan/nonmetropolitan
proportions in the population and to correct for non-response bias.
n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001
Table 5-23: I am concerned about environmental problems because of the consequences for: MY
OWN HEALTH
N
Not at all
important
Extremely
important
Mean
F=0.532 n.s.;
η=0.024
Mean
Statewide 1 853 2.3% 4.2% 4.9% 15.9% 21.5% 22.1% 29.2% 5.3
METRO 365 2.2% 3.6% 6.8% 16.4% 20.3% 21.6% 29.0% 5.3
NONMETRO 525 2.3% 4.4% 4.2% 15.0% 21.7% 21.7% 30.7% 5.4
χ2 =3.916 n.s., Cramer’s V=0.066
1
A stratified sample based on region of residence was drawn. Statewide data is weighted to reflect metropolitan/nonmetropolitan
proportions in the population and to correct for non-response bias.
n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001
F=0.466 n.s.;
η=0.023
Table 5-24: I am concerned about environmental problems because of the consequences for:
NATURE
N
Not at all
important
253
Extremely
important
Mean
Statewide 1 853 1.3% 1.2% 4.3% 10.8% 17.5% 26.8% 38.0% 5.7
METRO 365 0.8% 1.6% 4.4% 9.9% 18.1% 27.4% 37.8% 5.8
NONMETRO 525 1.5% 1.1% 3.8% 10.9% 16.6% 26.1% 40.0% 5.8
χ2 =2.325 n.s., Cramer’s V=0.051
1
A stratified sample based on region of residence was drawn. Statewide data is weighted to reflect metropolitan/nonmetropolitan
proportions in the population and to correct for non-response bias.
n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001
F=0.044 n.s.;
η=0.007