29.07.2013 Views

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 5: Environmental Values<br />

Environmental Values<br />

Survey recipients completed 15 items that measure the new ecological paradigm (Dunlap et al., 2000)<br />

(Tables 5-1 to 5-15). More than half <strong>of</strong> the respondents agreed that: (a) when humans interfere with nature<br />

it <strong>of</strong>ten produces disastrous consequences ( x =3.5) (Table 5-2), (b) humans are severely abusing the<br />

environment ( x =3.4) (Table 5-4), (c) the earth has plenty <strong>of</strong> natural resources if we just learn how to<br />

develop them ( x =3.4) (Table 5-5), (d) plants and animals have as much right as humans to exist ( x =3.4)<br />

(Table 5-6), (e) despite our special abilities humans are still subject to the laws <strong>of</strong> nature ( x =4.1) (Table<br />

5-8), (f) the earth is like a spaceship with very limited room and resources ( x =3.4) (Table 5-10), and (g)<br />

the balance <strong>of</strong> nature is very delicate and easily upset ( x =3.7) (Table 5-12). More than half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents disagreed that: (a) humans have the right to modify the natural environment to suit their<br />

needs ( x =2.5) (Table 5-1), (b) the balance <strong>of</strong> nature is strong enough to cope with the impacts <strong>of</strong> modern<br />

industrial nations ( x =2.3) (Table 5-7), and (c) humans will eventually learn enough about how nature<br />

works to be able to control it ( x =2.4) (Table 5-13).<br />

Consequences <strong>of</strong> Environmental Problems<br />

246<br />

Respondents were asked to respond to nine items to indicate why they were concerned about<br />

environmental problems (Tables 5-16 to 5-24). Respondents were most concerned about environmental<br />

problems because <strong>of</strong> consequences for children ( x =6.0) (Table 5-20), future generations ( x =6.0) (Table<br />

5-22), and nature ( x =5.7) (Table 5-24). They were least concerned about consequences for: (a)<br />

themselves ( x =5.1) (Table 5-16), their future ( x =5.3) (Table 5-19), and their own health ( x =5.3) (Table<br />

5-23).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!