29.07.2013 Views

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 1: Message Quality<br />

Table 1-3: I find the message to be compelling.<br />

N<br />

Extremely<br />

disagree<br />

Quite<br />

disagree<br />

Slightly<br />

disagree<br />

Neutral Slightly<br />

agree<br />

Quite<br />

agree<br />

Extremely<br />

agree<br />

Control 510 9.4% 10.8% 9.6% 30.4% 17.5% 14.9% 7.5% 4.10a Basic 154 7.8% 7.8% 6.5% 24.0% 22.7% 18.8% 12.3% 4.52ab DNR declaration 178 7.9% 7.3% 8.4% 23.6% 21.9% 20.2% 10.7% 4.48ab Concession question 160 5.0% 13.1% 7.5% 25.0% 18.8% 23.1% 7.5% 4.39ab Qualifier 160 9.4% 6.9% 11.9% 18.8% 18.1% 23.8% 11.3% 4.46ab Value expressive 177 10.2% 10.7% 7.3% 23.7% 20.9% 18.1% 9.0% 4.25ab Social adjustive –<br />

norms aligned<br />

196 5.6% 10.2% 7.1% 26.0% 19.9% 21.9% 9.2% 4.47ab Social adjustive –<br />

160 3.8% 7.5% 8.8% 24.4% 27.5% 21.3% 6.9% 4.56b norms not aligned<br />

3 rd person narrative 169 7.1% 7.7% 11.2% 25.4% 19.5% 21.9% 7.1% 4.37ab 1 st person narrative 164 7.9% 7.9% 7.3% 22.0% 20.1% 25.6% 9.1% 4.52ab χ2 =59.362 n.s.; Cramer’s V = 0.070<br />

F=2.249*<br />

η=0.100<br />

n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001<br />

Letters a, ab, b indicate significant differences in Games-Howell post-hoc test.<br />

Table 1-4: The message seems logical.<br />

N<br />

Extremely<br />

disagree<br />

Quite<br />

disagree<br />

Slightly<br />

disagree<br />

Neutral Slightly<br />

agree<br />

Quite<br />

agree<br />

Extremely<br />

agree<br />

Control 509 9.0% 10.6% 8.1% 12.8% 22.0% 26.7% 10.8% 4.51a Basic 156 7.1% 5.1% 6.4% 7.7% 15.4% 34.6% 23.7% 5.18ab DNR declaration 175 8.0% 5.1% 6.9% 13.1% 20.0% 31.4% 15.4% 4.88ab Concession question 158 3.2% 7.6% 8.9% 5.1% 22.2% 38.0% 15.2% 5.10b Qualifier 160 10.0% 6.3% 6.9% 6.9% 20.6% 29.4% 20.0% 4.90ab Value expressive 174 8.6% 8.0% 8.6% 9.2% 20.1% 28.7% 16.7% 4.77ab Social adjustive –<br />

norms aligned<br />

196 6.1% 6.1% 7.1% 10.2% 15.8% 33.7% 20.9% 5.08b Social adjustive –<br />

161 1.2% 5.0% 8.1% 12.4% 17.4% 37.9% 18.0% 5.25b norms not aligned<br />

292<br />

3 rd person narrative 167 7.2% 5.4% 6.6% 12.0% 21.0% 34.1% 13.8% 4.92ab 1 st person narrative 164 4.3% 6.7% 6.7% 12.8% 15.9% 36.0% 17.7% 5.08b χ2 =83.825**; Cramer’s V = 0.083<br />

F=4.658***<br />

η=0.143<br />

n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001<br />

Letters a, ab, b indicate significant differences in Games-Howell post-hoc test.<br />

Mean<br />

Mean

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!