29.07.2013 Views

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 5: Agreement With Message Recommendations<br />

Table 5-9: Would you be likely or unlikely to support a ban on using lead shot to hunt small game<br />

in the farmland zone <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minnesota</strong> within the next 5 years?<br />

N Extremely<br />

unlikely<br />

Quite<br />

unlikely<br />

Slightly<br />

unlikely<br />

Neutral Slightly<br />

likely<br />

Quite<br />

likely<br />

Extremely<br />

likely<br />

Control 502 23.5% 13.3% 9.8% 7.2% 13.5% 18.1% 14.5% 3.86<br />

Basic 157 12.7% 9.6% 8.3% 5.1% 15.3% 25.5% 23.6% 4.71<br />

DNR declaration 181 21.0% 9.4% 9.9% 3.3% 11.0% 23.8% 21.5% 4.31<br />

Concession question 157 18.5% 14.0% 7.0% 6.4% 10.8% 24.2% 19.1% 4.26<br />

Qualifier 159 19.5% 10.7% 3.8% 6.9% 15.7% 27.0% 16.4% 4.35<br />

Value expressive 172 20.9% 9.3% 6.4% 4.7% 12.2% 25.6% 20.9% 4.38<br />

Social adjustive –<br />

norms aligned<br />

193 16.6% 9.8% 5.7% 6.2% 14.5% 27.5% 19.7% 4.53<br />

Social adjustive –<br />

norms not aligned<br />

152 14.5% 8.6% 8.6% 8.6% 11.8% 28.3% 19.7% 4.59<br />

3 rd person narrative 167 17.4% 9.0% 7.8% 12.0% 12.0% 28.1% 13.8% 4.32<br />

1 st person narrative 164 13.4% 10.4% 7.3% 7.3% 14.6% 21.3% 25.6% 4.66<br />

n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001<br />

χ 2 = 73.372*; Cramer’s V = 0.078<br />

Table 5-10: I intend to support a ban on lead shot in the <strong>Minnesota</strong> farmland zone.<br />

N Extremely<br />

Disagree<br />

Quite<br />

Disagree<br />

313<br />

Slightly<br />

Disagree<br />

Neutral Slightly<br />

Agree<br />

Quite<br />

Agree<br />

Extremely<br />

agree<br />

Mean<br />

F=3.873***;<br />

η=0.131<br />

Control 525 22.9% 11.8% 7.6% 17.9% 13.3% 15.0% 11.4% 3.78<br />

Basic 162 13.0% 9.9% 6.8% 20.4% 9.9% 21.6% 18.5% 4.43<br />

DNR declaration 182 19.8% 8.2% 9.9% 16.5% 12.1% 17.0% 16.5% 4.10<br />

Concession question 166 19.3% 12.0% 6.0% 18.1% 10.8% 22.9% 10.8% 4.01<br />

Qualifier 166 19.9% 10.2% 3.6% 12.7% 21.1% 18.7% 13.9% 4.16<br />

Value expressive 181 20.4% 9.9% 3.3% 20.4% 11.6% 20.4% 13.8% 4.09<br />

Social adjustive –<br />

norms aligned<br />

202 18.8% 9.9% 4.5% 18.8% 11.9% 23.3% 12.9% 4.16<br />

Social adjustive –<br />

norms not aligned<br />

164 13.4% 8.5% 9.1% 17.1% 10.4% 25.6% 15.9% 4.43<br />

3 rd person narrative 174 18.4% 6.9% 7.5% 22.4% 12.1% 24.1% 8.6% 4.10<br />

1 st person narrative 167 13.8% 9.6% 7.2% 15.6% 14.4% 24.0% 15.6% 4.41<br />

n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001<br />

χ 2 =74.427*; Cramer’s V = 0.077<br />

Mean<br />

F=2.830**<br />

η=0.110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!