2007 Summaries of Wildlife Research Findings - Minnesota State ...

Table 5-19: I am concerned about environmental problems because of the consequences for: MY
FUTURE
N
Not at all
important
Extremely
important
Statewide 1 851 2.2% 4.3% 5.8% 15.4% 23.5% 21.0% 27.8% 5.3
METRO 364 2.2% 4.1% 7.7% 14.3% 22.8% 21.2% 27.7% 5.3
NONMETRO 524 2.1% 4.4% 5.0% 15.3% 23.7% 21.0% 28.6% 5.3
χ 2 =2.948 n.s., Cramer’s V=0.058
1 A stratified sample based on region of residence was drawn. Statewide data is weighted to reflect metropolitan/nonmetropolitan
proportions in the population and to correct for non-response bias.
n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001
Table 5-20: I am concerned about environmental problems because of the consequences for:
CHILDREN
N
Not at all
important
Extremely
important
Mean
F=0.290 n.s.;
η=0.018
Mean
Statewide 1 851 1.8% 1.5% 2.6% 8.1% 11.4% 21.7% 52.9% 6.0
METRO 366 1.4% 1.1% 2.7% 8.2% 10.9% 23.2% 52.5% 6.1
NONMETRO 523 1.9% 1.5% 2.5% 7.6% 11.1% 21.0% 54.3% 6.0
χ2 =1.431 n.s., Cramer’s V=0.040
1
A stratified sample based on region of residence was drawn. Statewide data is weighted to reflect metropolitan/nonmetropolitan
proportions in the population and to correct for non-response bias.
n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001
F=0.011 n.s.;
η=0.003
Table 5-21: I am concerned about environmental problems because of the consequences for: BIRDS
N
Not at all
important
252
Extremely
important
Mean
Statewide 1 852 1.6% 2.8% 4.9% 16.5% 21.9% 23.1% 29.2% 5.4
METRO 364 1.1% 3.3% 5.8% 12.9% 20.1% 28.0% 28.8% 5.5
NONMETRO 525 1.7% 2.5% 4.4% 17.1% 22.3% 20.8% 31.2% 5.4
χ2 =10.086 n.s., Cramer’s V=0.107
1
A stratified sample based on region of residence was drawn. Statewide data is weighted to reflect metropolitan/nonmetropolitan
proportions in the population and to correct for non-response bias.
n.s. = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001
F=0.159 n.s.;
η=0.013