04.08.2013 Views

LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS OF ... - Drake University

LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS OF ... - Drake University

LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS OF ... - Drake University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

human values even though it achieves only an ordinal scale" (Miethe,<br />

There are no meaningful rank-order correlations between individual<br />

values, and despite numerous attempts, factor analysis has not produced<br />

a consistent set of underlying factors. Research found that test-retest<br />

reliabilities for the terminal values of the RVS ranged from .78 three weeks<br />

P<br />

after the initial survey results to .69 at 14-1 6 months after initial completion<br />

of the survey. Additionally, instrumental test-retest reliabilities ranged<br />

from .71-.61 across the same period (Rokeach, 1973).<br />

Validity studies showed that "individualism-achievement and<br />

collectivism-affiliation are underlying dimensions of the RVS for both the<br />

terminal and instrumental values" (Johnston, 1995, p. 583). Collectivism is<br />

considered to be a culture that describes a tight social framework in which<br />

people expect others in groups of which they are a part to look after them<br />

and protect them. On the other hand, individualism is considered to be a<br />

culture describing the degree to which people prefer to act as individuals<br />

rather than as members of a group. Johnston found that the two<br />

dimensions, individualism and collectivism, are not single, bipolar<br />

dimensions, but are two distinct dimensions. Therefore, the leaders'<br />

values can fall more heavily into one of two dimensions (Johnston, 1995).<br />

Seventy-two individuals completed the RVS as the researchers<br />

attempted to determine the possible value dimensions of the tool. For

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!