14.08.2013 Views

THE YAKHA: CULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN ...

THE YAKHA: CULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN ...

THE YAKHA: CULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Steward was predated by Meggers (1954), but Steward's approach is more<br />

sophisticated than Meggers' invocation of possibilist 'limitations'.<br />

Steward introduced the term "culture coren to describe those aspects<br />

of culture most closely linked, at the functional level, to the natural<br />

setting. These for him were the primary focus of study, Steward also<br />

distinguished salient environmental features which have a bearing on<br />

cultural patterns, such as the kinds of animals in the environments of<br />

hunt i ng bands and the techniques used to hunt them, where this has<br />

a direct effect on group size and social organisation. He admitted that<br />

'secondary' features of culture might be determined to a great extent by<br />

purely cultural-historical factors (thus allowing for the strength of<br />

the Boasian/Kroeberian 'cultural ideology'), but saw a privileged place<br />

for the study of subsistence and economic aspects in the development of<br />

society. In this respect he was a more sophisticated (some would say<br />

eclectic) thinker than Leslie White (19,59), who attributed a virtually<br />

monocausal determining role in the unilinear evolution of culture to<br />

levels of energy use.<br />

Steward's work is a worthy attempt at refining the doctrine of<br />

'possibilism' to make it more workable in research terms, It exhibits<br />

shades of Marxism, perhaps, in its acceptance of a materialistic theory<br />

of society, and more so in its analysis of an infrastructural culture<br />

core and a superstructural cultural pattern. Because of this, Steward's<br />

work may have appealed to more radical American intellectuals in an era<br />

when overt Marxism in a1 1 its forms was regarded as beyond the pa!e of<br />

normal social and academic discourse. It is similarly based on a theory<br />

of social evolution rather than function, a point not a!ways<br />

sufficiently taken into account by Steward's critics. However, while

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!