Greece - US Department of State
Greece - US Department of State
Greece - US Department of State
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
722 Foreign Relations, 1969–1976, Volume XXIX<br />
“President: One thing is relevant: The <strong>US</strong>IA people say that the<br />
only major U.S. paper they see in Europe is the Herald-Tribune. That’s<br />
basically the New York Times and Post. The TV in Europe is statecontrolled<br />
and leftist-oriented. What is involved is a barrage <strong>of</strong> propaganda<br />
unfavorable to the U.S.—and also a negative picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Greeks. The idea is that the U.S. shouldn’t give arms and then the<br />
Greeks would change. They’d change alright, but the wrong way. In<br />
1947 I visited <strong>Greece</strong> as a young Congressman. I talked to guerrillas—<br />
who were probably properly coached—and I came back convinced that<br />
the Greek-Turkish Aid program should go forward. I got a barrage <strong>of</strong><br />
cards and letters saying, ‘Don’t give arms, give food to <strong>Greece</strong>.’ The<br />
left was against giving arms. The major difference is that in the 1950’s<br />
it was unfashionable to support Communists but it is no longer so.<br />
People now say they don’t care about the security <strong>of</strong> Europe; they want<br />
the Greeks to be pure. I don’t know what would happen at the lower<br />
levels in Europe. I know what I’d do—we need the Greeks because <strong>of</strong><br />
10 divisions, and the Mid-east. We don’t like the government but we’d<br />
like its successor less. We can’t do this, <strong>of</strong> course. Papandreou is a coldeyed<br />
tough guy <strong>of</strong> the left. We have to do it right. Constantine should<br />
come back for his interest and <strong>Greece</strong>’s interest and tell them we believe<br />
they should move and say they will move.<br />
“VP: Has the media and opinion effect really been examined? The<br />
media here are not representative. Couldn’t this be true in other countries,<br />
too?<br />
“President: The American leader class—the intellectuals, the media,<br />
etc.—they have a viewpoint that makes them no longer fit for leadership.<br />
The strength <strong>of</strong> America is in the ‘hard-hats’—the stevedores,<br />
the working people, some in the colleges. But American opinion in a<br />
hard decision could be with you. It’s not so in Europe. Luns, who’s a<br />
tough man, said that on TV.<br />
“Rogers: One thing <strong>of</strong> the difference between the young and the<br />
old: The young don’t remember the war and they have no sense <strong>of</strong><br />
history.<br />
“President: Tasca, you go back and try to get it done. If we follow<br />
the Danes, the Norwegians and other Socialists, the French and Italians,<br />
we do nothing. They are weak; we’ve got to lead. We’ve got to<br />
support the Greeks. It must be made palatable. The others all know if<br />
we weren’t there, they’d be terrified. We look all the more important<br />
because the Europeans can’t sell security to their own people.<br />
“Rogers: All they really ask us to do is do it wisely—not the Danes<br />
and Norwegians—but they help us by taking our problems into<br />
consideration.<br />
“Tasca: We care about it but we want to talk and bring the Greeks<br />
along. The Greeks are very friendly.”