14.08.2013 Views

Greece - US Department of State

Greece - US Department of State

Greece - US Department of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Greece</strong> 771<br />

—Senate Report. This is included to give you the flavor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Moose–Lowenstein report which is probably reflective <strong>of</strong> the current<br />

mood on Capitol Hill. 6<br />

Talking Points for Opening the Meeting<br />

1. There is no crisis in <strong>Greece</strong> and the choice among options is<br />

fairly narrow. However, it seemed worthwhile to review the situation<br />

since it has turned out somewhat differently from what we anticipated<br />

when the President made his decision to resume a normal military assistance<br />

relationship last June.<br />

2. You find on reading the IG paper that the choices are really relatively<br />

narrow. Since the basic assumptions underlying policy have<br />

changed, you would like to focus in the meeting on discussing whether<br />

the basic elements <strong>of</strong> our strategy are still valid. The tactics will have<br />

to be left to the <strong>State</strong> <strong>Department</strong>, but it does seem worthwhile here to<br />

discuss basic objectives.<br />

3. You would like, therefore, to aim at some sort <strong>of</strong> statement <strong>of</strong><br />

what it is we are and are not trying to achieve in <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />

4. You would like to divide the discussion into two parts:<br />

—the question <strong>of</strong> our general posture toward the military<br />

government;<br />

—the question <strong>of</strong> our posture toward King Constantine.<br />

General <strong>US</strong> Posture Toward <strong>Greece</strong><br />

Background. The IG paper does not really distinguish clearly between<br />

the two main options that it suggests. Option II is what Ambassador<br />

Tasca says he is doing now—prodding the regime privately<br />

on issues related to return to constitutional government. Option III is<br />

what the IG paper says is our current policy—a “passive” policy <strong>of</strong><br />

prodding only modestly when the opportunity arises. We need to arrive<br />

at a fairly precise statement <strong>of</strong> exactly what is going on and what<br />

we will try to do within what limits. The following talking points are<br />

suggested:<br />

—The IG paper outlines four options, but it points out that only<br />

Options II and III represent a real choice. Can we all agree on that?<br />

—What is the difference between Options II and III? The IG paper<br />

describes Option III as our present policy, while Ambassador Tasca<br />

has sent in a cable [copy on top <strong>of</strong> the IG paper] 7 saying that Option<br />

II reflects accurately the policy he has been following. Can someone<br />

6<br />

See footnote 4, Document 303.<br />

7<br />

Brackets in the original.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!