Greece - US Department of State
Greece - US Department of State
Greece - US Department of State
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Greece</strong> 621<br />
The King then briefly described his meeting on March 31 with<br />
Deputy Prime Minister Pattakos which had taken place at the Greek<br />
Embassy. In response to Mr. Pattakos’ statement that the King should<br />
not press for his return to <strong>Greece</strong>, the latter had replied he was not<br />
pushing for this, but thought he and the government should now start<br />
talking about the future <strong>of</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>. The King was surprised to hear Mr.<br />
Pattakos say that it was not possible for the Greek Government representatives<br />
to meet with the King because if this became public the government<br />
would be overthrown. The King had nonetheless asked Mr.<br />
Pattakos to tell Prime Minister Papadopoulos that he still felt it would<br />
be useful for the two <strong>of</strong> them to meet. The King observed that the Prime<br />
Minister was under the strong control <strong>of</strong> the younger <strong>of</strong>ficers in the<br />
junta. The King also sensed that the Prime Minister was worried as to<br />
what the younger <strong>of</strong>ficers might do if Papadopoulous should win any<br />
eventual elections.<br />
The Secretary asked for the King’s views on what the U.S. attitude<br />
should be towards the Greek Government. The King responded that<br />
the U.S. should keep up strong pressures for constitutional evolution,<br />
because if there was no pressure on the Greek Government, it would<br />
just play for time, stay in power a long while, and continue the process<br />
<strong>of</strong> removing senior army <strong>of</strong>ficers. It would also take advantage <strong>of</strong> any<br />
opportunity to enhance its image, such as the fact that the President<br />
had had a private meeting with Mr. Pattakos at the White House reception<br />
but not with himself.<br />
The Secretary noted that there was a limit as to what the <strong>US</strong>G<br />
should and could do in this regard. The <strong>US</strong>G had repeatedly been asked<br />
to become involved on different sides <strong>of</strong> international problems, (e.g.,<br />
the Nigerian-Biafran issue) and the <strong>US</strong>G was very reluctant to do this.<br />
It would be inappropriate to become involved in what was a domestic<br />
matter. The Secretary continued that the <strong>US</strong>G respects the King’s<br />
role as Chief <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> and the importance <strong>of</strong> having a strong <strong>Greece</strong> as<br />
a member <strong>of</strong> the NATO alliance. This stance poses a dilemma for the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s on the issue <strong>of</strong> deliveries <strong>of</strong> military equipment to <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
The King stated that the Greek Government needs the equipment<br />
both for military strength and also for psychological reasons. He suggested<br />
the <strong>US</strong>G tell the Greek Government that it should either implement<br />
the constitution fully or there would be no military aid. He<br />
added that the Greek Government is extremely sensitive to United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s views. Such a posture on military aid would also help the rest<br />
<strong>of</strong> the army who would then realize that the <strong>US</strong>G meant to link constitutional<br />
evolution to military aid.<br />
The Secretary responded that we would be reluctant to tie our assistance<br />
to a NATO partner strictly to <strong>Greece</strong>’s internal affairs. He added,<br />
however, that we had made clear to Greek Government <strong>of</strong>ficials that