Greece - US Department of State
Greece - US Department of State
Greece - US Department of State
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 Printed from a copy that bears this typed signature.<br />
<strong>Greece</strong> 689<br />
equipment. The suspended shipments were to be resumed, but only<br />
after the President reviewed your report <strong>of</strong> the Greek Government’s<br />
response to your representations about movement toward a constitutional<br />
situation, beginning with the less dramatic items.<br />
My understanding was that in accordance with this mandate you<br />
would explore this whole matter in a cooperative way with the Greek<br />
Government, and we would await your report <strong>of</strong> that exploration.<br />
When that phase was over, you would then be in a position to recommend<br />
when Papadopoulos should be informed that we had decided<br />
to lift the suspension <strong>of</strong> shipments, and to recommend, as well, the<br />
speed with which deliveries should be resumed, and what items ought<br />
to go beginning with the less dramatic items.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> this scenario, thanks to your efforts, is now behind us. I<br />
suggest that you could bring it nearer completion by immediately taking<br />
the following steps: Send us (a) a succinct synthesis <strong>of</strong> all your conversations<br />
with the high-level people; (b) your evaluation <strong>of</strong> the current<br />
attitude <strong>of</strong> the Greek Government with special reference to the<br />
prospects <strong>of</strong> its moving in a constitutional direction; and (c) your recommendations<br />
as to when and how the arms embargo should be lifted.<br />
We would then bring your evaluation and recommendation to the<br />
attention <strong>of</strong> the White House, following which we should be in a position<br />
to transmit to you the appropriate go-ahead to inform Papadopoulos<br />
<strong>of</strong> our plans.<br />
We not only do not believe it is necessary, but believe it undesirable<br />
and contrary to what was contemplated by the November NSC<br />
decision, for this whole matter to be reassessed in the context <strong>of</strong> a<br />
broader study <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean. If this were your recommendation,<br />
you would in effect be asking the President to reassess a decision<br />
which had already been made.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Joseph J. Sisco 4