Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2007

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2. Pre-screening data for OSU winter 6-row AMBA Pilot submissions and the AMBA quality check variety (88Ab536), 2007. Selection STAB 47/KAB 51-7 Source plump (% on 6/64) STAB 50-7-3 STAB113/KAB 50-21 88AB536 Grain protein (%) Aberdeen, ID 89 14.6 Pendleton, OR 91 11.3 Aberdeen, ID 93 14.5 Pendleton, OR 95 11.6 Aberdeen, ID 87 13.7 Pendleton, OR 92 11.1 Aberdeen, ID 84 15.3 Pendleton, OR 82 13.2 Table 3. Malting quality data for OSU winter 6-row malting lines and check varieties. Eight-twelve and 88Ab536 are the AMBA agronomic and quality checks, respectively. Average of 2004 and 2005 crop years, CCRU data; 6 station years. Strider and Maja are OSU feed varieties included as checks to measure progress; Eight-twelve is a feed variety with no malting quality. Samples were not submitted for analysis. Selection Malt extract (%) Barley protein (%) Wort protein (%) Diastatic power ( 0 ASBC) Alpha amylase (20 0 DU) Wort Beta glucan (ppm) 88Ab536-B 78.8 12.1 4.5 126 56.6 276 Strider 77.1 12.2 3.5 55 37.1 626 Maja 80.7 10.5 4.2 114 51.5 122 Eight-Twelve NA NA NA NA NA NA StabBC 50-7-3 79.4 10.5 3.4 91 45.3 467 Stab 47/Kab 51-7 80.5 11.4 4.2 105 53.0 307 S113/K50-21 80.1 11.0 4.1 121 48.2 238 Stab 47/Kab 51-20 80.1 11.1 4.6 142 64.6 182 108
Table 4. Agronomic data for OSU winter 6-row malting lines and check varieties. Average of 2005, 2006 crop years; 10 station years. Selection Grain Yield Plump Test weight Height (lbs/acre) (% on 6/64) (lbs/bu) (inches) 88Ab536-B 6467 75 52 43 Strider 7374 81 53 38 Maja 7045 81 54 40 Eight-Twelve 7099 70 50 38 StabBC 50-7-3 7505 94 54 45 Stab 47/Kab 51-7 7182 87 53 44 S113/K50-21 6955 81 52 44 Stab 47/Kab 51-20 7062 92 53 43 Table 5. Disease resistance data for OSU winter 6-row malting lines and check varieties. Selection Barley stripe rust Corvallis, 2006 (% disease severity) Barley stripe rust UC-Davis, 2005/2006 average (% disease severity) Scald rating Corvallis, 2006 (9 = lesions on flag leaf) 88Ab536-B 90 60 6 Strider 8 0 3 Maja 6 42 5 Eight-Twelve 93 70 7 StabBC 50-7-3 6 0 2 Stab 47/Kab 51-7 3 0 3 S113/K50-21 11 0 4 Stab 47/Kab 51-20 3 0 7 Table 6. Winter hardiness (% survival) for OSU winter 6-row malting lines and check varieties under field conditions at Pendleton, Oregon and under controlled environment conditions (-13 o C) at Martonvasar, Hungary. Selection Pendleton, Oregon Martonvasar, Hungary Average AMBA Drill strip CAP trial 88Ab536-B 50 60 60 57 Strider * 48 58 53 Maja * 66 78 72 Eight-Twelve * 75 82 79 StabBC 50-7-3 30 50 84 55 Stab 47/Kab 51-7 50 60 80 63 S113/K50-21 30 55 77 54 Stab 47/Kab 51-20 60 85 93 79 109
Page 1 and 2:
Annual Pro
Page 3 and 4:
-i- INTRODUCTION The March 2007 <st
Page 5 and 6:
USDA-ARS NORTHERN CROP SCIENCE LABO
Page 7 and 8:
Spring Regional over two years at D
Page 9 and 10:
Table 1. 2006 UCD Two-Rowed Malting
Page 11 and 12:
environments was practiced, 2) elit
Page 13 and 14:
Table 4. Selected six-rowed lines c
Page 15 and 16:
Other Barley Research: Feed Program
Page 17 and 18:
Executive Summary AMBA Prog
Page 19 and 20:
Table 1. Agronomic performance of M
Page 21 and 22:
Lines M122 and M124 were rated sati
Page 23 and 24:
EARLY GENERATION LINES Forty F5 pop
Page 25 and 26:
have evaluated a PCR based marker,
Page 27 and 28:
Edward Schiefelbein, Research Scien
Page 29 and 30:
small grains pathology input to thi
Page 31 and 32:
Project Personnel Small Grains Path
Page 33 and 34:
Investigations on Barley Diseases a
Page 35 and 36:
Minnesota barley disease survey and
Page 37 and 38:
pathotypes at the seedling stage in
Page 39 and 40:
germplasm with the highest level of
Page 41 and 42:
Mirlohi, A., Brueggeman, R., Steffe
Page 43 and 44:
Developing Improved Malt Barley Var
Page 45 and 46:
Table 2. Montana’s Statewide Tria
Page 47 and 48:
As a Barley CAP collaborator, our C
Page 49 and 50:
3.2. A barley nursery composed of d
Page 51 and 52:
5. Related Barley Projects Barley P
Page 53 and 54:
Barley Breeding - Advanced Testing
Page 55 and 56:
Table 3. Agronomic comparisons of N
Page 57 and 58: Preliminary Malting Barley Yield Tr
Page 59 and 60: dwarf genotypes with the convention
Page 61 and 62: STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND THEI
Page 63 and 64: inoculated plots. The inoculum used
Page 65 and 66: much of North Dakota in 2006, few f
Page 67 and 68: 5. Collect isolates of barley patho
Page 69 and 70: oot rot. In collaboration with Scot
Page 71 and 72: 2. United States Wheat and Barley S
Page 73 and 74: 6. Lee, S. and Neate, S.M. (2006) P
Page 75 and 76: Objectives Met in the One-Year Fund
Page 77 and 78: These automated methods have been t
Page 79 and 80: Beta-limit dextrin Alpha-Amylase Al
Page 81 and 82: M w kDa 800 600 400 200 0 0.4 0 2 4
Page 83 and 84: Figure 7. Time course of I2-binding
Page 85 and 86: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1993 1994 19
Page 87 and 88: 2. Other Research (A) Predicting Se
Page 89 and 90: forms (through enzymolysis during m
Page 91 and 92: PUBLICATIONS (2006-07) Schwarz, P.B
Page 93 and 94: CI9214, PI552963 (Heartland), and N
Page 95 and 96: showing good levels of resistance t
Page 97 and 98: Germplasm Enhancement for RWA Resis
Page 99 and 100: Gary Hein in Colorado and Nebraska.
Page 101 and 102: Kevin Hicks, Research Leader, USDA-
Page 103 and 104: Detailed Report on
Page 105 and 106: Other Barley Research and Future Di
Page 107: Table 1. 2006/2007 Oregon winter ba
Page 111 and 112: MALTING QUALITY ANALYSIS OF NEW BAR
Page 113 and 114: We recently secured an industrial c
Page 115 and 116: 2006-2007 Progress
Page 117 and 118: enzyme it encodes. We found that se
Page 119 and 120: horseradish peroxidase-conjugated g
Page 121 and 122: found in plant cell walls. The degr
Page 123 and 124: Establishing that sequence variatio
Page 125: Charles Karpelenia, technician Joe
show all

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2007

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?