Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2007

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 1. Winter survival data for OSU selections, check varieties, and elite European varieties (in a -13 0 controlled freeze test) and at Pendleton, Oregon (rated 2/2007). WxW and S X W = selections from winter x winter and spring x winter crosses, respectively. # Lines # lines 14 12 10 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 8 6 4 2 0 1-5 1-5 6-10 6-10 11-15 11-15 16-20 16-20 MRI Freeze Test 2006 21-25 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 Strider (ave of 13) (48%) StabBC 50-7-3 (50%) 26-30 31-35 Strider (58%) 88Ab536 (60%) 41-45 S113/K50-21 (77%) Maja (78%) STAB47/KAB51-7 (80%) 46-50 51-55 56-60 Survival % Pendleton 2006-07 36-40 41-45 S113/K50-21 (55%) 46-50 51-55 56-60 % green foliage 61-65 66-70 71-75 WxW SxW 76-80 88Ab536 (60%) Stab 47/Kab 51-7 (60%) Maja (ave of 13) (66%) 61-65 66-70 71-75 76-80 Eight-Twelve (82%) STABBC50-7-3 (84%) 81-85 81-85 86-90 86-90 STAB47/ KAB51-20 (93%) 91-95 91-95 WxW SxW Eight-Twelve (75%) Stab 47/Kab 51- 20 (85%) 96-100 96-100 110
MALTING QUALITY ANALYSIS OF NEW BARLEY SELECTIONS 2006 CROP YEAR REPORT Allen D. Budde, Chris Martens and Mark R. Schmitt. Cereal Crops Research Unit, USDA Agricultural Research Service MARCH 9, 2007 Executive Summary: The Malting Quality Analysis project at the Cereal Crops Research Unit (CCRU) in Madison is an on-going effort to provide information to a number of state and federally funded barley breeders on the malting quality of new barley selections. Upon receipt of seed from cooperating breeders, we micro-malt the samples of the various lines, and then analyze the resulting malt for a number of parameters used to assess the suitability of the line for development of commercial malting varieties. Our goal is to provide accurate and timely data on the malting quality of the submitted samples to assist barley breeders in making their breeding line selections. We also carry out investigations on the malting barley in order to better understand the biochemical basis for malt production and malting quality. The QA lab completed the 2005 crop year analyses in August, 2006, in time to prepare for the move to a new facility. The 2005 crop year analyses represent the greatest number of samples that have ever been malted and analyzed in one year at the CCRU. The QA lab was moved in October of 2006. We encountered a number of expected and unexpected issues, which have delayed us from initiating malting of breeder’s submissions. Nearly all issues have been resolved and performance testing is nearly complete. If performance testing goes well, we hope to begin malting 2006 crop year submissions the week of March 12. We have plans in place to process an increased number of samples per week through to initiation of malting the 2007 crop year samples. Remaining submissions from the 2006 crop year will be malted and analyzed as time permits. As a result of discussions at the 2007 Barley Improvement Conference, breeders are being provided with barley analytical data as the best alternative to our usual malt analyses. As of March 9, 2007, barley data on 2000 submissions have been reported back to the breeders. We have prepared the AMBA pilot and plant scale malts using our Joe White micromalters and have completed malting 50% of the regional nursery submissions. Analyses of these malts will be completed prior to the Spring AMBA Technical Committee meeting. 111
Page 1 and 2:
Annual Pro
Page 3 and 4:
-i- INTRODUCTION The March 2007 <st
Page 5 and 6:
USDA-ARS NORTHERN CROP SCIENCE LABO
Page 7 and 8:
Spring Regional over two years at D
Page 9 and 10:
Table 1. 2006 UCD Two-Rowed Malting
Page 11 and 12:
environments was practiced, 2) elit
Page 13 and 14:
Table 4. Selected six-rowed lines c
Page 15 and 16:
Other Barley Research: Feed Program
Page 17 and 18:
Executive Summary AMBA Prog
Page 19 and 20:
Table 1. Agronomic performance of M
Page 21 and 22:
Lines M122 and M124 were rated sati
Page 23 and 24:
EARLY GENERATION LINES Forty F5 pop
Page 25 and 26:
have evaluated a PCR based marker,
Page 27 and 28:
Edward Schiefelbein, Research Scien
Page 29 and 30:
small grains pathology input to thi
Page 31 and 32:
Project Personnel Small Grains Path
Page 33 and 34:
Investigations on Barley Diseases a
Page 35 and 36:
Minnesota barley disease survey and
Page 37 and 38:
pathotypes at the seedling stage in
Page 39 and 40:
germplasm with the highest level of
Page 41 and 42:
Mirlohi, A., Brueggeman, R., Steffe
Page 43 and 44:
Developing Improved Malt Barley Var
Page 45 and 46:
Table 2. Montana’s Statewide Tria
Page 47 and 48:
As a Barley CAP collaborator, our C
Page 49 and 50:
3.2. A barley nursery composed of d
Page 51 and 52:
5. Related Barley Projects Barley P
Page 53 and 54:
Barley Breeding - Advanced Testing
Page 55 and 56:
Table 3. Agronomic comparisons of N
Page 57 and 58:
Preliminary Malting Barley Yield Tr
Page 59 and 60: dwarf genotypes with the convention
Page 61 and 62: STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND THEI
Page 63 and 64: inoculated plots. The inoculum used
Page 65 and 66: much of North Dakota in 2006, few f
Page 67 and 68: 5. Collect isolates of barley patho
Page 69 and 70: oot rot. In collaboration with Scot
Page 71 and 72: 2. United States Wheat and Barley S
Page 73 and 74: 6. Lee, S. and Neate, S.M. (2006) P
Page 75 and 76: Objectives Met in the One-Year Fund
Page 77 and 78: These automated methods have been t
Page 79 and 80: Beta-limit dextrin Alpha-Amylase Al
Page 81 and 82: M w kDa 800 600 400 200 0 0.4 0 2 4
Page 83 and 84: Figure 7. Time course of I2-binding
Page 85 and 86: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1993 1994 19
Page 87 and 88: 2. Other Research (A) Predicting Se
Page 89 and 90: forms (through enzymolysis during m
Page 91 and 92: PUBLICATIONS (2006-07) Schwarz, P.B
Page 93 and 94: CI9214, PI552963 (Heartland), and N
Page 95 and 96: showing good levels of resistance t
Page 97 and 98: Germplasm Enhancement for RWA Resis
Page 99 and 100: Gary Hein in Colorado and Nebraska.
Page 101 and 102: Kevin Hicks, Research Leader, USDA-
Page 103 and 104: Detailed Report on
Page 105 and 106: Other Barley Research and Future Di
Page 107 and 108: Table 1. 2006/2007 Oregon winter ba
Page 109: Table 4. Agronomic data for OSU win
Page 113 and 114: We recently secured an industrial c
Page 115 and 116: 2006-2007 Progress
Page 117 and 118: enzyme it encodes. We found that se
Page 119 and 120: horseradish peroxidase-conjugated g
Page 121 and 122: found in plant cell walls. The degr
Page 123 and 124: Establishing that sequence variatio
Page 125: Charles Karpelenia, technician Joe
show all

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2007

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?