Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2007

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2. Pre-screening data for OSU winter 6-row AMBA Pilot submissions and the AMBA quality check variety (88Ab536), 2007. Selection STAB 47/KAB 51-7 Source plump (% on 6/64) STAB 50-7-3 STAB113/KAB 50-21 88AB536 Grain protein (%) Aberdeen, ID 89 14.6 Pendleton, OR 91 11.3 Aberdeen, ID 93 14.5 Pendleton, OR 95 11.6 Aberdeen, ID 87 13.7 Pendleton, OR 92 11.1 Aberdeen, ID 84 15.3 Pendleton, OR 82 13.2 Table 3. Malting quality data for OSU winter 6-row malting lines and check varieties. Eight-twelve and 88Ab536 are the AMBA agronomic and quality checks, respectively. Average of 2004 and 2005 crop years, CCRU data; 6 station years. Strider and Maja are OSU feed varieties included as checks to measure progress; Eight-twelve is a feed variety with no malting quality. Samples were not submitted for analysis. Selection Malt extract (%) Barley protein (%) Wort protein (%) Diastatic power ( 0 ASBC) Alpha amylase (20 0 DU) Wort Beta glucan (ppm) 88Ab536-B 78.8 12.1 4.5 126 56.6 276 Strider 77.1 12.2 3.5 55 37.1 626 Maja 80.7 10.5 4.2 114 51.5 122 Eight-Twelve NA NA NA NA NA NA StabBC 50-7-3 79.4 10.5 3.4 91 45.3 467 Stab 47/Kab 51-7 80.5 11.4 4.2 105 53.0 307 S113/K50-21 80.1 11.0 4.1 121 48.2 238 Stab 47/Kab 51-20 80.1 11.1 4.6 142 64.6 182 108
Table 4. Agronomic data for OSU winter 6-row malting lines and check varieties. Average of 2005, 2006 crop years; 10 station years. Selection Grain Yield Plump Test weight Height (lbs/acre) (% on 6/64) (lbs/bu) (inches) 88Ab536-B 6467 75 52 43 Strider 7374 81 53 38 Maja 7045 81 54 40 Eight-Twelve 7099 70 50 38 StabBC 50-7-3 7505 94 54 45 Stab 47/Kab 51-7 7182 87 53 44 S113/K50-21 6955 81 52 44 Stab 47/Kab 51-20 7062 92 53 43 Table 5. Disease resistance data for OSU winter 6-row malting lines and check varieties. Selection Barley stripe rust Corvallis, 2006 (% disease severity) Barley stripe rust UC-Davis, 2005/2006 average (% disease severity) Scald rating Corvallis, 2006 (9 = lesions on flag leaf) 88Ab536-B 90 60 6 Strider 8 0 3 Maja 6 42 5 Eight-Twelve 93 70 7 StabBC 50-7-3 6 0 2 Stab 47/Kab 51-7 3 0 3 S113/K50-21 11 0 4 Stab 47/Kab 51-20 3 0 7 Table 6. Winter hardiness (% survival) for OSU winter 6-row malting lines and check varieties under field conditions at Pendleton, Oregon and under controlled environment conditions (-13 o C) at Martonvasar, Hungary. Selection Pendleton, Oregon Martonvasar, Hungary Average AMBA Drill strip CAP trial 88Ab536-B 50 60 60 57 Strider * 48 58 53 Maja * 66 78 72 Eight-Twelve * 75 82 79 StabBC 50-7-3 30 50 84 55 Stab 47/Kab 51-7 50 60 80 63 S113/K50-21 30 55 77 54 Stab 47/Kab 51-20 60 85 93 79 109
Page 1 and 2:
Annual Pro
Page 3 and 4:
-i- INTRODUCTION The March 2007 <st
Page 5 and 6:
USDA-ARS NORTHERN CROP SCIENCE LABO
Page 7 and 8:
Spring Regional over two years at D
Page 9 and 10:
Table 1. 2006 UCD Two-Rowed Malting
Page 11 and 12:
environments was practiced, 2) elit
Page 13 and 14:
Table 4. Selected six-rowed lines c
Page 15 and 16:
Other Barley Research: Feed Program
Page 17 and 18:
Executive Summary AMBA Prog
Page 19 and 20:
Table 1. Agronomic performance of M
Page 21 and 22:
Lines M122 and M124 were rated sati
Page 23 and 24:
EARLY GENERATION LINES Forty F5 pop
Page 25 and 26:
have evaluated a PCR based marker,
Page 27 and 28:
Edward Schiefelbein, Research Scien
Page 29 and 30:
small grains pathology input to thi
Page 31 and 32:
Project Personnel Small Grains Path
Page 33 and 34:
Investigations on Barley Diseases a
Page 35 and 36:
Minnesota barley disease survey and
Page 37 and 38:
pathotypes at the seedling stage in
Page 39 and 40:
germplasm with the highest level of
Page 41 and 42:
Mirlohi, A., Brueggeman, R., Steffe
Page 43 and 44:
Developing Improved Malt Barley Var
Page 45 and 46:
Table 2. Montana’s Statewide Tria
Page 47 and 48:
As a Barley CAP collaborator, our C
Page 49 and 50:
3.2. A barley nursery composed of d
Page 51 and 52:
5. Related Barley Projects Barley P
Page 53 and 54:
Barley Breeding - Advanced Testing
Page 55 and 56:
Table 3. Agronomic comparisons of N
Page 57 and 58: Preliminary Malting Barley Yield Tr
Page 59 and 60: dwarf genotypes with the convention
Page 61 and 62: STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND THEI
Page 63 and 64: inoculated plots. The inoculum used
Page 65 and 66: much of North Dakota in 2006, few f
Page 67 and 68: 5. Collect isolates of barley patho
Page 69 and 70: oot rot. In collaboration with Scot
Page 71 and 72: 2. United States Wheat and Barley S
Page 73 and 74: 6. Lee, S. and Neate, S.M. (2006) P
Page 75 and 76: Objectives Met in the One-Year Fund
Page 77 and 78: These automated methods have been t
Page 79 and 80: Beta-limit dextrin Alpha-Amylase Al
Page 81 and 82: M w kDa 800 600 400 200 0 0.4 0 2 4
Page 83 and 84: Figure 7. Time course of I2-binding
Page 85 and 86: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1993 1994 19
Page 87 and 88: 2. Other Research (A) Predicting Se
Page 89 and 90: forms (through enzymolysis during m
Page 91 and 92: PUBLICATIONS (2006-07) Schwarz, P.B
Page 93 and 94: CI9214, PI552963 (Heartland), and N
Page 95 and 96: showing good levels of resistance t
Page 97 and 98: Germplasm Enhancement for RWA Resis
Page 99 and 100: Gary Hein in Colorado and Nebraska.
Page 101 and 102: Kevin Hicks, Research Leader, USDA-
Page 103 and 104: Detailed Report on
Page 105 and 106: Other Barley Research and Future Di
Page 107: Table 1. 2006/2007 Oregon winter ba
Page 111 and 112: MALTING QUALITY ANALYSIS OF NEW BAR
Page 113 and 114: We recently secured an industrial c
Page 115 and 116: 2006-2007 Progress
Page 117 and 118: enzyme it encodes. We found that se
Page 119 and 120: horseradish peroxidase-conjugated g
Page 121 and 122: found in plant cell walls. The degr
Page 123 and 124: Establishing that sequence variatio
Page 125: Charles Karpelenia, technician Joe
show all

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2007

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?