Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2007

More documents

Recommendations

Info

data. Many additional lines had quality scores in the 50’s. Harrington is not grown at Davis because its susceptibility to several diseases results in very poor malting quality and low grain yields. Checks include the following: Orca, which has a good grain yield at Davis, ND 22202 from No. Dakota, three lines from BARI designated by the 2B99 prefix, and two ICARDA/CIMMYT lines which are among the most recent donors of multiple disease resistances. Grain yield data will be available by Sept. ‘07. The project continues to identify six-rowed parents useful in creating new populations. Agronomically these lines have several major defects that result in their being poorly adapted to the Central Valley. Generally they have inadequate grain yield, shatter badly, and are susceptible to several California barley diseases. Drummond, 94AB13449, and B98-9339 have already been crossed to STUC 6,derived from Stander X UC 960, to create new segregating populations which are now in the F3 generation. Additionally five crosses were made to Oregon St. winter lines using STUC 6 as a parent. Other barley research and future direction of program The barley breeding program has been traditionally a feed barley program. The feed barley portion of the program has decreased in size. The hulless barely “Tamalpais” , which was tested as UC 1134, will be released and commercialized in the Central Valley. UC 1135, a sib of UC 1134, is exceptionally high in grain Beta-glucan (>7%). Components of the barley program include the goals of feed, forage, human consumption, and malting barley, the latter of which is becoming the dominant portion of the breeding effort. Six-rowed parents which are likely to be used in the ’07 crossing cycle include: Tradition from BARI, 94Ab13449 from Idaho, 01NZ706 from Washington, STAB47/KAB51-20 from Oregon, and Robust-RWA (Russian Wheat Aphid) from Minnesota via USDA, OK. New two-rowed parents will include the following: Craft and 98Ab11993 depending upon agronomic appearance in the field in April ’07. These six- and two-rowed parents will be crossed to material having a broader range of resistances to important diseases found in the Central Valley. Project personnel None Publication Gallagher, L.W., L.F. Jackson, and H.E. Vogt, Registration of ‘Ishi’ barley, Crop Sci. 46:1396 (2006). 8
Table 1. 2006 UCD Two-Rowed Malting Barley Selections - Davis, CA Kernel on Barley Malt Wort Barley Wort DP Alpha- Beta- Qual- Over- Weight 6/64" Color Extract Wort Clar- Protein Protein S/T (deg amylase glucan ity all ENTRY (mg) (%) (Agtron) (%) Color ity (%) (%) (%) ASBC) (20°DU) (ppm) Score Rank BCD/TTA-N 44.4 97.5 66 81.5 1.7 1 11.3 4.59 42.5 177 80.3 50 65 1 BCD/TTA-MQ29 41.9 91.0 66 81.2 1.6 1 12.5 4.86 41.4 183 111.1 52 64 2 BCD/TTA-V 45.3 96.6 57 79.5 1.5 1 11.6 4.66 41.5 144 80.5 77 62 3 SAL/TTA-MQ28 39.8 90.4 66 80.3 1.6 1 11.4 4.48 40.1 151 88.6 46 59 4 SAL/TTA-E 43.9 96.3 52 79.5 2.3 1 12.3 5.34 44.3 117 85.4 52 59 4 SAL/TTA-I 43.6 96.5 65 79.3 1.9 1 12.9 5.45 43.0 159 91.0 38 59 4 SAL/TTA-K 44.3 91.1 60 78.7 1.5 1 12.6 4.98 40.6 182 96.3 28 59 4 BCD/6/A… 44.9 94.5 60 78.3 1.7 1 12.5 4.92 40.1 126 84.1 58 59 4 BCD/TTA-W 40.9 88.6 72 80.9 1.6 1 11.6 4.86 42.9 143 106.2 59 59 4 BCD/TTA-C 40.7 92.7 61 80.2 1.8 1 11.3 4.70 43.0 119 78.2 32 58 10 BCD/TTA-J 38.4 89.4 63 79.9 1.5 1 11.6 4.52 41.3 143 94.5 82 57 11 SAL/TTA-L 41.3 88.8 54 78.5 1.9 1 12.7 5.07 40.3 178 101.0 66 56 12 BU/TTA-A 42.2 92.8 71 79.2 1.5 1 12.9 5.25 42.6 171 76.0 120 55 13 SAL/TTA-F 44.0 97.3 63 81.7 2.2 1 10.8 4.93 47.3 119 95.1 18 52 14 BCD/TTA-Q 41.5 92.4 71 80.4 1.5 1 10.3 4.24 42.4 131 84.8 83 52 14 BCD/TTA-R 42.5 93.6 72 82.4 2.2 1 9.7 4.44 47.2 118 106.2 42 52 14 BCD/TTA-I 38.6 81.6 64 79.3 1.6 1 11.1 4.49 41.9 134 74.6 42 51 17 BCD/TTA-U 41.3 94.2 70 79.2 1.6 1 11.6 4.51 39.3 150 86.5 122 49 18 BCD/TTA-D 42.0 82.4 65 79.3 2.0 1 11.2 5.06 46.6 103 67.3 111 47 19 BCD/TTA-T 44.9 95.5 69 81.0 1.4 1 9.9 3.97 43.5 117 81.5 17 47 19 2B99-2039 34.5 77.8 70 81.3 1.4 1 11.8 4.88 41.9 126 95.1 131 47 19 2B99-2763-10 34.8 76.1 70 79.3 2.3 1 12.8 4.80 38.9 144 77.4 173 47 19 ND22202 39.5 93.7 49 79.4 1.7 1 12.7 5.03 41.3 111 73.5 266 46 23 SAL/TTA-A 43.7 94.1 52 77.6 1.5 1 13.0 4.64 36.0 163 58.8 101 46 23 BCD/TTA-G 41.3 91.7 63 78.0 1.4 1 12.9 4.87 39.1 153 78.8 163 46 23 ORCA 49.8 98.6 47 77.9 1.6 1 13.1 4.66 36.4 149 67.5 41 45 26 SAL/TTA-D 43.9 95.0 55 78.0 1.7 1 13.0 4.83 38.4 129 70.5 83 45 26 BU/TTA-C 39.5 80.3 66 80.1 1.6 1 9.9 4.48 48.4 123 77.0 38 44 28 BCD/TTA-B 46.9 98.2 46 78.1 1.4 1 11.8 3.82 32.7 107 49.0 48 44 28 BCD/TTA-L 41.5 88.4 66 78.5 1.6 1 12.5 4.74 39.2 173 94.9 163 44 28 SAL/TTA-B 44.6 97.3 65 79.8 1.2 1 11.5 3.91 34.6 151 67.6 173 43 31 2B99-2771-1 34.1 84.2 75 80.7 2.2 1 11.9 4.64 40.6 122 82.8 260 43 31 BCD/TTA-H 37.5 89.5 68 81.1 1.5 1 9.3 4.11 47.8 105 75.5 36 41 33 30IB299 47.2 95.4 44 77.7 2.1 1 13.1 4.01 31.6 143 40.4 121 34 34 29IB20 49.9 97.2 44 77.8 1.8 1 12.2 3.83 32.7 79 49.4 321 29 35 Malt Check HARRINGTON 37.5 86.1 78 81.1 2.5 1 12.5 5.77 47.0 91 73.6 189 40 HARRINGTON 38.6 86.2 78 81.5 1.6 1 12.6 5.49 45.0 115 86.1 170 50 Minima 34.1 76.1 44 77.6 1.2 9.3 3.82 31.6 79 40.4 17 29 Maxima 49.9 98.6 75 82.4 2.3 13.1 5.45 48.4 183 111.1 321 65 Means 42.1 91.4 62 79.6 1.7 11.8 4.65 40.9 138 80.8 95 50 Std Dev 3.7 6.0 9 1.3 0.3 1.1 0.42 4.1 25 16.1 74 8 Coeff Var 8.8 6.5 14 1.6 17.0 9.0 8.96 10.1 18 20.0 78 16 Malt Check Data are Excluded from Rank Sorting and Statistics For Wort Clarity - 1 = clear, 2 = slightly hazy, 3 = hazy 9
Page 1 and 2: Annual Pro
Page 3 and 4: -i- INTRODUCTION The March 2007 <st
Page 5 and 6: USDA-ARS NORTHERN CROP SCIENCE LABO
Page 7: Spring Regional over two years at D
Page 11 and 12: environments was practiced, 2) elit
Page 13 and 14: Table 4. Selected six-rowed lines c
Page 15 and 16: Other Barley Research: Feed Program
Page 17 and 18: Executive Summary AMBA Prog
Page 19 and 20: Table 1. Agronomic performance of M
Page 21 and 22: Lines M122 and M124 were rated sati
Page 23 and 24: EARLY GENERATION LINES Forty F5 pop
Page 25 and 26: have evaluated a PCR based marker,
Page 27 and 28: Edward Schiefelbein, Research Scien
Page 29 and 30: small grains pathology input to thi
Page 31 and 32: Project Personnel Small Grains Path
Page 33 and 34: Investigations on Barley Diseases a
Page 35 and 36: Minnesota barley disease survey and
Page 37 and 38: pathotypes at the seedling stage in
Page 39 and 40: germplasm with the highest level of
Page 41 and 42: Mirlohi, A., Brueggeman, R., Steffe
Page 43 and 44: Developing Improved Malt Barley Var
Page 45 and 46: Table 2. Montana’s Statewide Tria
Page 47 and 48: As a Barley CAP collaborator, our C
Page 49 and 50: 3.2. A barley nursery composed of d
Page 51 and 52: 5. Related Barley Projects Barley P
Page 53 and 54: Barley Breeding - Advanced Testing
Page 55 and 56: Table 3. Agronomic comparisons of N
Page 57 and 58: Preliminary Malting Barley Yield Tr
Page 59 and 60:
dwarf genotypes with the convention
Page 61 and 62:
STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND THEI
Page 63 and 64:
inoculated plots. The inoculum used
Page 65 and 66:
much of North Dakota in 2006, few f
Page 67 and 68:
5. Collect isolates of barley patho
Page 69 and 70:
oot rot. In collaboration with Scot
Page 71 and 72:
2. United States Wheat and Barley S
Page 73 and 74:
6. Lee, S. and Neate, S.M. (2006) P
Page 75 and 76:
Objectives Met in the One-Year Fund
Page 77 and 78:
These automated methods have been t
Page 79 and 80:
Beta-limit dextrin Alpha-Amylase Al
Page 81 and 82:
M w kDa 800 600 400 200 0 0.4 0 2 4
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 7. Time course of I2-binding
Page 85 and 86:
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1993 1994 19
Page 87 and 88:
2. Other Research (A) Predicting Se
Page 89 and 90:
forms (through enzymolysis during m
Page 91 and 92:
PUBLICATIONS (2006-07) Schwarz, P.B
Page 93 and 94:
CI9214, PI552963 (Heartland), and N
Page 95 and 96:
showing good levels of resistance t
Page 97 and 98:
Germplasm Enhancement for RWA Resis
Page 99 and 100:
Gary Hein in Colorado and Nebraska.
Page 101 and 102:
Kevin Hicks, Research Leader, USDA-
Page 103 and 104:
Detailed Report on
Page 105 and 106:
Other Barley Research and Future Di
Page 107 and 108:
Table 1. 2006/2007 Oregon winter ba
Page 109 and 110:
Table 4. Agronomic data for OSU win
Page 111 and 112:
MALTING QUALITY ANALYSIS OF NEW BAR
Page 113 and 114:
We recently secured an industrial c
Page 115 and 116:
2006-2007 Progress
Page 117 and 118:
enzyme it encodes. We found that se
Page 119 and 120:
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated g
Page 121 and 122:
found in plant cell walls. The degr
Page 123 and 124:
Establishing that sequence variatio
Page 125:
Charles Karpelenia, technician Joe
show all

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2007

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?