20.08.2013 Views

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The subscales; Low Self Esteem (LSE), Personal Alienation (PA), Interpersonal<br />

Insecurity (II), Interpersonal Alienation (IA), Interoceptive Deficits (ID), Emotional Dysregulation<br />

(ED), Perfectionism (P), Asceticism (A) and Maturity Fears (MF) are termed<br />

psychological scales.<br />

The 7 items on the DT scale assess for an extreme desire to be thinner, concern with<br />

dieting, a preoccupation with weight and an intense fear <strong>of</strong> weight gain. This scale is<br />

thought to be a good predictor <strong>of</strong> binge eating and <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> formal eating<br />

disorders in adolescents and adults. Girls with higher body weights have higher DT<br />

scores. The B scale assesses the tendency to think about, and engage in bouts <strong>of</strong><br />

uncontrollable overeating. The presence <strong>of</strong> binge eating is one <strong>of</strong> the defining features <strong>of</strong><br />

bulimia. The BD scale assesses discontentment with the overall shape and size <strong>of</strong> regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the body that are <strong>of</strong> great concern to those who have eating disorders.<br />

Eating Disorder Risk Composite<br />

The subscales <strong>of</strong> Drive for Thinness (DT), Bulimia (B) and Body Dissatisfaction (BD)<br />

together indicate eating disorder risk which is calculated using the Eating Disorder Risk<br />

Composite Score (EDRC). This is calculated by summing the T scores for the Drive for<br />

Thinness, Bulimia and Body Dissatisfaction scales. This was used, as is recommended, in<br />

order to obtain one score reflecting the level <strong>of</strong> eating concerns. The total EDRC is<br />

divided into the following three categories elevated clinical range, typical clinical range<br />

and low clinical range. These were renamed low, moderate and high eating disorder risk<br />

(EDR) groups for the purposes <strong>of</strong> this study. The elevated clinical range category is in the<br />

99 th percentile for the adolescent non clinical U.S sample indicating extreme eating and<br />

weight concerns that consist <strong>of</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> weight gain, desire to be thinner, binge eating<br />

tendencies and body dissatisfaction. Thus it is suggested that a score in this range should<br />

raise concerns about the presence <strong>of</strong> a clinical eating disorder or serious eating concerns<br />

or symptoms. The typical clinical range score is between the 91 st and 98 th percentile for<br />

the adolescent non clinical U.S sample and the low clinical range is less than the 90 th<br />

percentile. Individuals from the latter group do not have significant problems with eating<br />

and weight concerns such as those stated for the elevated clinical range group.<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!