20.08.2013 Views

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conclusion<br />

This study found that inflexible emotional processing from an Acceptance and<br />

Commitment Therapy (ACT) perspective was significantly higher in the high Eating<br />

Disorder Risk (EDR) group as compared to moderate and low EDR groups. Those with a<br />

higher acceptance <strong>of</strong> body image (from an ACT perspective) displayed less inflexible<br />

emotional processing. The low EDR group was found to have a higher body image<br />

acceptance than the moderate and high risk groups. Furthermore, as regards mood, a<br />

significant mean difference in depression between the Body Mass Index (BMI) groups<br />

was found such that the underweight BMI group had higher rates <strong>of</strong> depression. This is<br />

difficult to explain and needs to be considered further. Inflexibility was also associated<br />

with higher scores on depression and anxiety as was predicted, further supporting its<br />

transdiagnostic significance.<br />

Therefore inflexibility was found to be higher in those with a higher eating disorder risk,<br />

higher rates <strong>of</strong> depression and anxiety as well as those with a less accepting stance<br />

towards their body image. There was also a negative association found between<br />

depression and anxiety and acceptance <strong>of</strong> body image. The results <strong>of</strong> this study support<br />

the ACT theory that states that inflexible emotional processing which includes cognitive<br />

fusion and experiential avoidance is associated with psychopathology including that <strong>of</strong><br />

mood disturbance and eating pathology. This study is a cross sectional design and so<br />

cannot make firm conclusions about cause and effect and does not allow one to follow<br />

the progression <strong>of</strong> a disorder. This study <strong>of</strong>fers support for ACT which needs to be<br />

evaluated in comparison to other approaches as regards the prevention and/or treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the eating disorders and associated problems.<br />

219

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!