20.08.2013 Views

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Therefore comparing adolescent females with a high EDR to individuals with a lower<br />

risk would enable an exploration <strong>of</strong> differences (in particular in relation to inflexibility)<br />

amongst the adolescents at a potentially early stage <strong>of</strong> an eating disorder.<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> the hypotheses<br />

Support for inflexibility as a transdiagnostic process<br />

A significant negative correlation (with a medium effect size) was found between<br />

inflexibility and body image acceptance so that higher inflexibility was associated with<br />

lower acceptance <strong>of</strong> body image. This was as predicted and lends support to the ACT<br />

theory that holds lower acceptance to be a part <strong>of</strong> inflexibility (presented in Figure 1, see<br />

Introduction). Flexibility includes ‘acceptance’ (defined above) which was looked at in<br />

relation to body image and inflexibility includes the opposite <strong>of</strong> ‘acceptance’ (i.e.<br />

experiential avoidance).<br />

It was then predicted that those in the high EDR group would have lower body image<br />

acceptance and higher inflexibility. This was supported; the high EDR group had higher<br />

inflexibility as compared to the low EDR group and less acceptance <strong>of</strong> their body image,<br />

(both with medium to large effect sizes). Body image dissatisfaction has <strong>of</strong>ten been<br />

presented as a risk factor in eating pathology (e.g. Killen, et al, 1996). ACT maintains<br />

that it is not body image dissatisfaction per se that results in an increased risk but a lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> psychological ‘acceptance’ (i.e. higher levels <strong>of</strong> experiential avoidance). This is<br />

considered further below. These findings confirmed the hypotheses that inflexibility is<br />

implicated in eating pathology and add support to the ACT literature that identifies<br />

inflexibility (i.e. cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance) as an important generic<br />

psychopathological process to be included in the understanding and treatment <strong>of</strong> those at<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> an ED.<br />

202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!