20.08.2013 Views

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)<br />

Zigmond and Snaith (1983)<br />

The HADS is a brief measure <strong>of</strong> anxiety and depression consisting <strong>of</strong> 14 items (7 for<br />

each).<br />

Scoring:<br />

Each item is rated on a four point (0–3) response category so the possible scores ranged<br />

from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression. An analysis <strong>of</strong> scores on the two<br />

subscales enabled provision <strong>of</strong> information that a score <strong>of</strong> 0 to 7 for either subscale could<br />

be regarded as being in the normal range, a score <strong>of</strong> 11 or higher indicating probable<br />

presence ('caseness') <strong>of</strong> the mood disorder and a score <strong>of</strong> 8 to 10 being just suggestive <strong>of</strong><br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> the respective state.<br />

The HADS was originally developed for people aged between 16 and 65. Only two<br />

studies focused explicitly on using the HADS in a population sample <strong>of</strong> adolescents, i.e.<br />

Jorngarden, Wettergen and Von Essen (2006) and White, Leach, Sims, Atkinson, and<br />

Cottrell (1999). The latter aimed at validating the HADS for use with a British adolescent<br />

population (aged 12–16). The study concluded that the HADS is reliable, and has<br />

adequate sensitivity and specificity, and is therefore useful for screening adolescents.<br />

Reliability and Validity:<br />

Cronbach’s coefficient was found to be 0.80 and Depression 0.76, in a sample <strong>of</strong> 69,648<br />

adult participants, therefore concluding that the basic psychometric properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />

HADS scale as a self rating instrument should be considered as ‘quite good’ in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

factor structure, intercorrelation, homogeneity, and internal consistency (Mykleton,<br />

Stordal and Dahl, 2001). White et al (1999) found that the HADS had adequate testretest<br />

reliability and factor structure, and discriminated between adolescents diagnosed<br />

with depressive or anxiety disorders and those without these diagnoses. They concluded<br />

that the psychometric properties <strong>of</strong> the HADS and its shortness make it useful for<br />

screening and in clinical settings with adolescents.<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!