20.08.2013 Views

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hypotheses III<br />

Inflexibility was positively associated with both depression rs = 0.46, p = 0.00 and<br />

anxiety, rs = 0.55, p = 0.00 with medium effect sizes. Body image acceptance was<br />

negatively associated with depression rs = 0.44, p = 0.00, and negatively associated with<br />

anxiety, rs =-0.50, p = 0.00 again with medium effect sizes. Moreover, there was a<br />

significant difference between the low and high EDR groups as regards anxiety (z = -<br />

2.67, p = 0.00) and depression (z = -1.60, p = 0.05) with large (0.9) and moderate (0.49)<br />

effect sizes for anxiety and depression respectively.<br />

Additional research questions - Background information in relation to EDR<br />

The additional research questions considered the contributing factors that were collected<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> the background information and were explored in relation to the key variable <strong>of</strong><br />

inflexibility and then compared across the EDR groups. Lastly, a prediction model was<br />

devised using logistic regression analysis.<br />

A significant mean difference between inflexibility and eating disorder family history<br />

was found, z = -1.86, p = 0.03, Cohen’s d = 0.57, thus a medium effect size. There was<br />

no significant difference found between mental illness family history and inflexibility and<br />

between drug and alcohol use and academic performance in relation to inflexibility. Thus<br />

those with an eating disorder history in their family had higher levels <strong>of</strong> inflexibility.<br />

Eating disorder family history was compared across the EDR groups and a borderline<br />

significance was found χ² = 4.37, df = 2, p = 0.11, Contingency Coefficient = 0.21. No<br />

significant difference was found across the groups regarding mental illness history. It was<br />

also found that the moderate and high EDR groups had a higher mean difference <strong>of</strong> drug<br />

and alcohol use with alcohol use being highly significant χ² = 14.75, df = 2, p = 0.00,<br />

Contingency Coefficient = 0.38.<br />

Bullying was considered across the EDR groups predicting a higher EDR but no<br />

significant mean difference was found between the groups.<br />

273

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!