20.08.2013 Views

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Other important ethical issues pertaining to the study included confidentiality <strong>of</strong> data and<br />

obligation to participate. The confidentiality issue was managed by informing all<br />

participants that all information gathered through the study would remain confidential.<br />

Only the researcher had access to information that would identify participants, and<br />

participants were informed that the researcher was bound by patient confidentiality limits<br />

as defined by the British Psychological Society (2000). All questionnaires were<br />

anonymised and numerically coded and locked in a secure location separate from any<br />

documents that may have identified participants, such as parental consent forms. All<br />

computerised data files were password protected and had no identifying information. To<br />

minimise any obligation participants may have felt to participate, the participant<br />

information sheet and consent forms clearly highlighted that individuals did not have to<br />

take part in the study and that they could withdraw at any time without giving a reason.<br />

Ethics approval was obtained from the Psychology Ethics Committee, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Hertfordshire</strong>. This was sought and obtained before contact with the participants was<br />

made (see appendix 11 for the approval letter). Further ethics approval was not deemed<br />

necessary as the sample was from a non clinical population.<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!