20.08.2013 Views

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Stice et al’s (2002, 2005) studies found a relationship between dietary restraint and later<br />

obesity using a prospective design. This is an improvement over cross-sectional data,<br />

nevertheless they still cannot rule out third-variable explanations for the relations that<br />

could account for the effects (e.g. a genetic propensity to gain weight). Although the<br />

longitudinal method and large sample sizes were strengths, the non-experimental nature<br />

precluded causal inferences. Additionally, weight-change history preceding study entry<br />

was not assessed. Also, in some studies, e.g. Stice (1999), there was no measure <strong>of</strong><br />

dietary intake, so it was unclear whether the association was attributable to, or<br />

independent <strong>of</strong>, actual dietary intake. Stice et al (2005) suggested that a crucial direction<br />

for future research would be to conduct randomised experiments that attempt to<br />

triangulate the effects from prospective studies. Randomised prevention trials could test<br />

whether reducing weight-control behaviours actually results in reduced risk for obesity<br />

onset. These types <strong>of</strong> experiments would effectively rule out the possibility that some<br />

unmeasured variable is responsible for the prospective effects observed in longitudinal<br />

studies.<br />

Furthermore, most <strong>of</strong> the studies measure BMI as it is the recommended measure <strong>of</strong><br />

adiposity in epidemiologic research; however, it can reflect elevations in other aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

body composition rather than adipose tissue, such as muscle mass, which can therefore<br />

confound results. Lastly, many studies relied on self-report measures and suffered sample<br />

bias e.g. in Keel et al’s (2007) study participants were recruited from a prestigious<br />

university so results may not be generalisable to other cohorts.<br />

Body image and emotion regulation in disordered eating<br />

As the majority <strong>of</strong> girls who exhibit body dissatisfaction do not go on to develop an<br />

eating disorder, researchers and theorists have looked to factors such as the role <strong>of</strong><br />

emotion regulation to help distinguish between normative levels <strong>of</strong> body dissatisfaction<br />

and levels that may increase the risk <strong>of</strong> clinical eating problems.<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!