20.08.2013 Views

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

DClinPsy Portfolio Volume 1 of 3 - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Research into effectiveness <strong>of</strong> current treatment for eating disorders<br />

Gowers and Bryant-Waugh (2004) point out that although eating disorders in children<br />

and adolescents remain a serious cause <strong>of</strong> morbidity and mortality, the evidence base for<br />

effective interventions is surprisingly weak. The adult literature is growing steadily, but<br />

this is mainly with regard to psychological therapies for Bulimia Nervosa. Their<br />

summary <strong>of</strong> the recent research literature covering psychological therapies in EDs<br />

concludes that although Fairburn and Harrison’s (2003) CBT model is currently the most<br />

effective treatment most studies only achieve complete remission in about 40% <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

(Wilson and Fairburn, 2002), the enhanced CBT model continues to be evaluated.<br />

Gowers et al (2004) suggest that future research should focus on psychological therapies<br />

for AN and evaluations <strong>of</strong> treatments for adult BN which are applied to the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

adolescents such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Interpersonal Therapy<br />

(IPT). As with adults, it is unlikely that CBT will be successful and/or acceptable as the<br />

primary treatment for all adolescents with BN, suggesting a need for further development<br />

and evaluation <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> other outpatient therapies. It appears that further research to<br />

evaluate treatment approaches in adolescence across the continuum <strong>of</strong> eating disturbance<br />

is still very much needed.<br />

Why might a transdiagnostic process be important?<br />

Finding a transdiagnostic process appears to be a potentially valuable pursuit as evidence<br />

suggests that individuals do not fit neatly into a diagnostic ED category. There is a higher<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> Eating Disorders Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS) in comparison to AN<br />

and BN with around half <strong>of</strong> all eating disorder patients not meeting full criteria for AN or<br />

BN (Turner and Bryant-Waugh, in press, in Gowers and Bryant-Waugh, 2004).<br />

Furthermore, there is a high incidence <strong>of</strong> movement from one diagnostic ED category to<br />

another over time and there is a high prevalence <strong>of</strong> co-morbidity alongside EDs or<br />

disordered eating/sub-clinical levels.<br />

210

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!