01.09.2013 Views

The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.2 Conclusions on contaminant levels<br />

In general, the AMAP studies have revealed that levels of organochlorines in<br />

Arctic biota are highest in the marine organisms belonging to the top trophic<br />

level (e.g. whales). This is particularly true in relation to bio-magnification of<br />

PCBs and DDT. AMAP activities have also shown a decrease in the levels of<br />

some POPs (e.g. PCBs and DDT), resulting from introduction of bans and restrictions<br />

relating to their use in other parts of the world (AMAP 2004, Muir<br />

& de Wit 2010). At the same time, however, levels of new persistent pollutants,<br />

such as brominated flame retardants, are on the increase (AMAP 2004,<br />

Muir & de Wit 2010), also in animals from Greenland. Levels of petroleum<br />

compounds, including PAHs, are relatively low in the Greenland environment<br />

and are regarded as background concentrations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> short overview given in this section documents that our present<br />

knowledge on contaminant levels in marine organisms from West Greenland<br />

and the assessment area is still limited. Further studies are needed to<br />

understand better whether and to what degree the biota in the assessment<br />

area are already impacted by contaminants, but also to serve as a baseline<br />

<strong>for</strong> future monitoring and assessments. In this respect it is important to learn<br />

more about the relationship between contaminant loads and potential biol<strong>og</strong>ical<br />

impact, including sublethal health effects or impairments.<br />

7.3 Biol<strong>og</strong>ical effects<br />

<strong>The</strong> research and monitoring activities described in the previous section<br />

clearly indicate the presence of different kinds of contaminants (e.g. POPs,<br />

heavy metals) in biota from Greenland. Regional differences in contaminant<br />

level have been found as well as differences between species, with highest<br />

concentrations apparent in top predators (e.g. polar bear, seals). However,<br />

contaminant levels are often still lower than in biota from more temperate<br />

regions, e.g. the North Sea or Baltic Sea. <strong>The</strong> question arises of whether the<br />

levels found in the Arctic are sufficiently high to cause biol<strong>og</strong>ical effects and<br />

what the threshold level of impact might be.<br />

Threshold levels have been estimated <strong>for</strong> various contaminants in a range of<br />

species both under laboratory conditions and in the field in European waters.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se studies have clearly indicated that organisms are affected by contaminants<br />

and that their physiol<strong>og</strong>ical responses depend on the duration<br />

and extent of exposure. <strong>The</strong> effects observed range from enzyme inhibition<br />

and changes in cellular processes, to immuno-suppression, neurotoxic and<br />

genotoxic effects up to reproduction impairment or histopathol<strong>og</strong>y alterations<br />

as endpoint of the pollutant impact. Differences in response have been<br />

demontrated among species and regions (Van der Oost et al. 2003, Lehtonen<br />

et al. 2006, Picado et al. 2007). Toxicity tests have also widely been used in<br />

temperate regions to relate environmental concentrations to biol<strong>og</strong>ical effects,<br />

but very few tests have been published on polar species.<br />

Species living in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic have very specific life strategies<br />

and population dynamics as a result of adaptation to the harsh environment.<br />

Moreover, their fat content and seasonal turnover can differ when compared<br />

to more temperate species (AMAP 2004). <strong>The</strong> lower temperatures in Greenlandic<br />

waters are also likely to have an impact on the toxicity of contaminants.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!