01.09.2013 Views

The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.5 Marine mammals and seabirds<br />

<strong>The</strong> impacts of climate change on marine mammals and seabirds are likely<br />

to be severe, and not so straight<strong>for</strong>ward to estimate since patterns of changes<br />

are non-uni<strong>for</strong>m and highly complex (ACIA 2005). Laidre et al. (2008) compared<br />

seven Arctic and four sub-Arctic marine mammal species with regard<br />

to their habitat requirements and evidence <strong>for</strong> biol<strong>og</strong>ical and dem<strong>og</strong>raphic<br />

responses to climate change. Sensitivity of the various species to climate<br />

change was assessed using a quantitative index based on population size,<br />

ge<strong>og</strong>raphic range, habitat specificity, diet diversity, migration, site fidelity,<br />

sensitivity to changes in sea ice, sensitivity to changes in the trophic web,<br />

and maximum population growth potential (Rmax). Marine mammals dependent<br />

on sea ice (e.g. hooded seal, polar bear and narwhal) appear to be<br />

most sensitive. Species such as ringed seal and bearded seal are less sensitive,<br />

primarily due to their large circumpolar distributions, large population<br />

sizes, and flexible habitat requirements. Due to their dependence on sea-ice<br />

habitat, the impacts of continued climate change will increase the vulnerability<br />

of all polar bear sub-populations. Population and habitat modelling have<br />

projected substantial future declines in the distribution and abundance of<br />

polar bears (Lunn et al. 2010).<br />

Arctic seabirds, which typically depend on large, energy-rich zooplankton,<br />

are likely to be negatively affected by increasing temperatures and decreasing<br />

ice cover, while more temperate piscivorous species may benefit from<br />

these changes (cf. Kitaysky & Golubova 2000). Changes in the extent and<br />

timing of sea-ice cover over the past several decades, <strong>for</strong> example, have led<br />

to changes in phenol<strong>og</strong>y and reproduction of thick-billed murres in Canada,<br />

with adverse consequences <strong>for</strong> nestling growth (Gaston et al. 2005). A circumpolar<br />

study of population change of both thick-billed and common<br />

murres showed that both species tended to decline following major changes<br />

in sea temperature (Irons et al. 2008). Within the assessment area it is likely<br />

that the breeding population of the partly planktivorous thick-billed murre<br />

will be gradually replaced by the cold-temperate sibling species, the piscivorous<br />

common murre (Gaston & Irons 2010). This will probably be a very<br />

slow process due to pronounced site fidelity and human disturbance. Other<br />

temperate species which may be favoured by increasing temperatures include<br />

the recent immigrant, the lesser black-backed gull. In general, the timing<br />

of spring migration and breeding of most species is likely to advance<br />

substantially in the coming decades. North of the assessment area, the phenol<strong>og</strong>y<br />

has already changed <strong>for</strong> common eider and thick-billed murre (AU &<br />

GINR, unpubl.). This may also be the case <strong>for</strong> the assessment area, but so far<br />

no data exist. Changing breeding conditions north of the assessment area,<br />

e.g., phenol<strong>og</strong>y, prey availability or available breeding habitats, may lead to<br />

changing numbers of wintering birds within the assessment area.<br />

8.6 Conclusions<br />

<strong>The</strong> examples given above clearly indicate that climate change has a large<br />

potential to modify marine ecosystems, particular in high latitude regions,<br />

either through a bottom-up reorganisation of the food web by altering the<br />

nutrient or light cycle, or top-down reorganisation by altering critical habitat<br />

<strong>for</strong> higher trophic level (Macdonald et al. 2005). Alterations in the density,<br />

distribution and/or abundance of keystone species at various trophic levels<br />

could have significant and rapid consequences <strong>for</strong> the structure of the ecosystems<br />

in which they currently occur.<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!