The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi
The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi
The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
detailed studies on the effect of seismic surveys on bottlenose whales, pilot<br />
whales, white beaked dolphins or harbour porpoises. White whales, narwhals<br />
and bowhead whales are also sensitive to seismic sounds, but are present<br />
in the area during wintertime only. Bowhead whales, <strong>for</strong> example, migrate<br />
through part of the assessment area in December-January (Heide-<br />
Jørgensen & Laidre 2010). <strong>The</strong> risk of overlap between these species and<br />
seismic operations is there<strong>for</strong>e confined to winter.<br />
In general, seals display considerable tolerance to underwater noise<br />
(Richardson et al. 1995), confirmed by a study in Arctic Canada in which<br />
ringed seals showed only limited avoidance of seismic operations (Lee et al.<br />
2005). In another study, ringed seals were shown to habituate to industrial<br />
noise (Blackwell et al. 2004). However, walruses, especially when hauled<br />
out, may be disturbed and displaced by seismic activity but not so much by<br />
the seismic noise. <strong>The</strong>re is an important winter feeding and mating ground<br />
<strong>for</strong> walrus where they haul out on ice directly north of the assessment area.<br />
Mitigation of impacts from seismic noise<br />
Mitigation measures generally recommend a soft start or ramp up of the airgun<br />
array each time a new line is initiated (review by Compton et al. 2008).<br />
This allows marine mammals to detect and avoid the sound source be<strong>for</strong>e it<br />
reaches levels dangerous to the animals.<br />
Secondly, it is recommended that skilled marine mammal observers are present<br />
onboard the seismic ships in order to detect whales and instruct the<br />
crew to delay shooting when whales are within a certain distance (usually<br />
500 m) of the array. In sensitive areas detection of whales in the vicinity can<br />
be made more efficient, depending on species, with the additional use of<br />
hydrophones <strong>for</strong> recording whale vocalisations (Passive Acoustic Monitoring<br />
– PAM); although the whales present would not necessarily emit sounds.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are problems with respect to visual observations. In Arctic waters,<br />
very high sound pressures may occur far from the sound source and out of<br />
sight of the observer (see above). Another problem is that seismic surveys<br />
are carried out day and night, and visual observations are only possible in<br />
daylight.<br />
A third mitigating measure is to close areas in sensitive periods. <strong>The</strong> spawning<br />
grounds <strong>for</strong> herring and cod are closed <strong>for</strong> seismic surveys in the Lofoten-Barents<br />
Sea area during the spawning season.<br />
NERI (now <strong>DCE</strong>) has issued a set of guidelines <strong>for</strong> conducting seismic surveys<br />
in Greenland waters, and protection areas (where seismic surveys are<br />
regulated) <strong>for</strong> narwhal and walrus are designated in areas outside the present<br />
assessment area (Boertmann et al. 2010). A similar protection area <strong>for</strong><br />
the bowhead whale should be considered in the Disko Bay waters in spring.<br />
Finally, it is recommended that local authorities and hunters' organisations<br />
be in<strong>for</strong>med be<strong>for</strong>e seismic activities take place in their local area. This may<br />
help hunters to take into account that animals may be disturbed and displaced<br />
from certain areas at times when activities are taking place.<br />
In Arctic Canada a number of mitigation measures were applied to minimise<br />
impacts from seismic surveys on marine mammals and the subsistence hunting<br />
of these (Miller et al. 2005). Some were identical to those mentioned<br />
above, and the most important was a delay in the start of seismic operation<br />
191