The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi
The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi
The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
196<br />
from the particles in the water-based mud have been observed on fish and<br />
bivalves under laboratory conditions (Bechmann et al. 2006).<br />
Mitigation of impacts from the release of drilling mud and cuttings<br />
<strong>The</strong> best way of mitigating impacts from drilling mud and cuttings in the<br />
marine environment is to bring these to land or re-inject the material into<br />
wellbores. This, however, creates other environmental impacts such as increased<br />
emission of greenhouse gasses from the transport and pumping and<br />
problems with treatment or re-use on land (SFT 2008). <strong>The</strong>se have then to be<br />
balanced against the impacts on the water column and on the seafloor. A recent<br />
report (SFT 2008) has recommended that general zero-discharge requirements<br />
relating to water-based drill cuttings and mud are not introduced<br />
in Norway.<br />
It is generally assessed that impacts from water-based muds are limited,<br />
which is why they are usually released to the marine environment when the<br />
drilling is over. However, as part of the post-drill environmental monitoring<br />
that licence holders off the coast of Greenland are required to per<strong>for</strong>m during<br />
exploration drilling, particle transport in relation to drilling mud has to<br />
be modelled and sediment traps have to be set up to measure the potential<br />
spatial distribution of these particles. Impacts can be further reduced by application<br />
of environmentally friendly drilling chemicals, such as those classified<br />
by OSPAR (HOCNF) as ‘green’/PLONOR (Pose Little Or No Risk to the<br />
Environment) or ‘yellow’. However, in general these chemicals have not yet<br />
been evaluated under Arctic conditions with regard to degradation and toxicity,<br />
and all chemicals to be discharged should be assessed and evaluated<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e they are approved <strong>for</strong> release.<br />
In Norway, releases to the marine environment of environmentally hazardous<br />
substances (‘red’ and ‘black’ chemicals) have been reduced by 99% in<br />
the period 1997-2007, through application of the international standards,<br />
BAT and BEP (SFT 2008). In Greenland the use of ‘black’ chemicals is not allowed<br />
and specific permission is required <strong>for</strong> the use of ‘red’ chemicals.<br />
Impacts from oil-contaminated drill cuttings should be mitigated by keeping<br />
them on board <strong>for</strong> deposition or cleaning on land.<br />
Conclusion on discharges from exploration drilling<br />
Within the assessment area only very local effects on the benthos are to be<br />
expected from discharging the water-based muds (WBM) during exploration<br />
drilling (Table 10.1.2). For this reason, the potential impact on benthic feeders,<br />
such as king eider, walrus and bearded seal, will probably not be significant.<br />
However, baseline studies and environmental monitoring should be<br />
conducted at all drill sites to document spatial and temporal effects, and to<br />
assess if there are unique communities or species that could be harmed.<br />
10.2 Appraisal activities<br />
Activities during the appraisal phase are similar to exploration activities (see<br />
above) and the impacts are the same. However, there is an increased risk of<br />
cumulative impacts as the phase usually takes place over several years.