01.09.2013 Views

The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

The Davis Strait - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196<br />

from the particles in the water-based mud have been observed on fish and<br />

bivalves under laboratory conditions (Bechmann et al. 2006).<br />

Mitigation of impacts from the release of drilling mud and cuttings<br />

<strong>The</strong> best way of mitigating impacts from drilling mud and cuttings in the<br />

marine environment is to bring these to land or re-inject the material into<br />

wellbores. This, however, creates other environmental impacts such as increased<br />

emission of greenhouse gasses from the transport and pumping and<br />

problems with treatment or re-use on land (SFT 2008). <strong>The</strong>se have then to be<br />

balanced against the impacts on the water column and on the seafloor. A recent<br />

report (SFT 2008) has recommended that general zero-discharge requirements<br />

relating to water-based drill cuttings and mud are not introduced<br />

in Norway.<br />

It is generally assessed that impacts from water-based muds are limited,<br />

which is why they are usually released to the marine environment when the<br />

drilling is over. However, as part of the post-drill environmental monitoring<br />

that licence holders off the coast of Greenland are required to per<strong>for</strong>m during<br />

exploration drilling, particle transport in relation to drilling mud has to<br />

be modelled and sediment traps have to be set up to measure the potential<br />

spatial distribution of these particles. Impacts can be further reduced by application<br />

of environmentally friendly drilling chemicals, such as those classified<br />

by OSPAR (HOCNF) as ‘green’/PLONOR (Pose Little Or No Risk to the<br />

Environment) or ‘yellow’. However, in general these chemicals have not yet<br />

been evaluated under Arctic conditions with regard to degradation and toxicity,<br />

and all chemicals to be discharged should be assessed and evaluated<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e they are approved <strong>for</strong> release.<br />

In Norway, releases to the marine environment of environmentally hazardous<br />

substances (‘red’ and ‘black’ chemicals) have been reduced by 99% in<br />

the period 1997-2007, through application of the international standards,<br />

BAT and BEP (SFT 2008). In Greenland the use of ‘black’ chemicals is not allowed<br />

and specific permission is required <strong>for</strong> the use of ‘red’ chemicals.<br />

Impacts from oil-contaminated drill cuttings should be mitigated by keeping<br />

them on board <strong>for</strong> deposition or cleaning on land.<br />

Conclusion on discharges from exploration drilling<br />

Within the assessment area only very local effects on the benthos are to be<br />

expected from discharging the water-based muds (WBM) during exploration<br />

drilling (Table 10.1.2). For this reason, the potential impact on benthic feeders,<br />

such as king eider, walrus and bearded seal, will probably not be significant.<br />

However, baseline studies and environmental monitoring should be<br />

conducted at all drill sites to document spatial and temporal effects, and to<br />

assess if there are unique communities or species that could be harmed.<br />

10.2 Appraisal activities<br />

Activities during the appraisal phase are similar to exploration activities (see<br />

above) and the impacts are the same. However, there is an increased risk of<br />

cumulative impacts as the phase usually takes place over several years.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!