16.09.2013 Views

Market Gaps on Access to Finance - Bank of Valletta

Market Gaps on Access to Finance - Bank of Valletta

Market Gaps on Access to Finance - Bank of Valletta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Malta Business Bureau – <str<strong>on</strong>g>Market</str<strong>on</strong>g> gaps in access <strong>to</strong> finance<br />

April 2013<br />

C: <strong>Bank</strong> overdraft, credit line or credit cards overdraft<br />

This type <strong>of</strong> finance is used by all “medium” SMEs, while “micro” SMEs used the overdraft facility<br />

less frequently (61%, average: 74%). The use <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> finance also varied across sec<strong>to</strong>rs. The<br />

retail/distributi<strong>on</strong> and pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al services sec<strong>to</strong>rs had the highest usage rate (92% and 82%<br />

respectively, average: 74%). Restaurants had the lowest rates <strong>of</strong> take up for this source <strong>of</strong> finance<br />

(55%). Firms in the start up phase used this source <strong>of</strong> finance the least (50%, average: 74%).<br />

D: <strong>Bank</strong> Loans<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> loans were also a popular source <strong>of</strong> finance, used by 64% <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal resp<strong>on</strong>dents. On the other<br />

hand, 34% never looked in<strong>to</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> finance – this may be attributable <strong>to</strong> a preference for own<br />

financing (used by 89% <strong>of</strong> the firms interviewed).<br />

All “Medium” SMEs used this type <strong>of</strong> finance, compared <strong>to</strong> half the micro enterprises. In terms <strong>of</strong><br />

sec<strong>to</strong>rs, the less frequent users <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> finance were firms in the Life Sciences and ICT<br />

sec<strong>to</strong>rs (50%, average: 64%). On the other hand, three-fourths <strong>of</strong> all manufacturing firms utilised<br />

bank loans.<br />

Start ups were less likely <strong>to</strong> utilise bank financing (30%; average: 64%), while emerging/ expansi<strong>on</strong><br />

growth firms were the most frequent users (75% and 77% respectively; average: 64%).<br />

E: Trade Credit<br />

Trade credit was also <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the most prevalent sources <strong>of</strong> finance, with an average <strong>of</strong> 65% usage.<br />

Micro firms were the less frequent users <strong>of</strong> trade credit (53%, average: 65%), while small<br />

enterprises were the most frequent users (76%; average: 65%). The retail sec<strong>to</strong>r was more likely <strong>to</strong><br />

utilise trade credit (75%, average; 65%). On the other hand, emerging growth firms were less likely<br />

<strong>to</strong> go for trade credit as a source <strong>of</strong> finance (25%, average: 65%).<br />

F: Other loan (e.g. related company/ shareholders, family, friends)<br />

This type <strong>of</strong> finance was not used by many firms (32%), and many firms from the interviewed<br />

sample thought that this was not relevant <strong>to</strong> their firm. This type <strong>of</strong> finance was mostly used by<br />

“medium” SMEs (53%; average: 32%).<br />

The Life Sciences and ICT sec<strong>to</strong>r, as well as the other services, used this type <strong>of</strong> finance more<br />

frequently (43% and 41% respectively, average: 32%), while manufacturing firms the least (19%,<br />

average: 32%). Firms in the emerging growth stage were aided more <strong>of</strong>ten by this type <strong>of</strong> finance<br />

(50%; average: 32%).<br />

G: Leasing/ hire-purchase/ fac<strong>to</strong>ring<br />

27% <strong>of</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>dents had utilised either leasing or hire-purchasing or fac<strong>to</strong>ring as a source <strong>of</strong><br />

finance. This was most likely <strong>to</strong> be the case with small firms (37%) and less likely <strong>to</strong> relate <strong>to</strong> micro<br />

firms (18%), <strong>to</strong>urism/ hospitality firms (23%) and start-ups (20%).<br />

H: Equity from other sources (including business angels, venture capital)<br />

This proved <strong>to</strong> be <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the least used type <strong>of</strong> finance (<strong>on</strong>ly 4 resp<strong>on</strong>dents), with the main reas<strong>on</strong>s<br />

being that resp<strong>on</strong>dents did not c<strong>on</strong>sider this type <strong>of</strong> financing as relevant <strong>to</strong> them or not being<br />

willing <strong>to</strong> dilute their ownership. N<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the SMEs resp<strong>on</strong>ding <strong>to</strong> the survey were listed, again since<br />

the resp<strong>on</strong>dents deem this source <strong>of</strong> financing not relevant <strong>to</strong> their firm.<br />

5.2.5 Q5: What was the reas<strong>on</strong> for your request being rejected/ <strong>on</strong>ly partially<br />

met/ your decisi<strong>on</strong> not <strong>to</strong> proceed further?<br />

The chart overleaf summarises the reas<strong>on</strong>s provided by resp<strong>on</strong>dents <strong>to</strong> explain why their<br />

applicati<strong>on</strong>s for financing were not taken forward, either by the authority/ instituti<strong>on</strong>, or by the<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>dents themselves (a <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong> 15 resp<strong>on</strong>ses). Refusals were generally linked <strong>to</strong> assistance<br />

schemes part-financed by nati<strong>on</strong>al and/ or EU funds. Some <strong>of</strong> the reas<strong>on</strong>s provided include:<br />

– Resp<strong>on</strong>dent did not meet applicati<strong>on</strong> requirements<br />

Page | 50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!