Market Gaps on Access to Finance - Bank of Valletta
Market Gaps on Access to Finance - Bank of Valletta
Market Gaps on Access to Finance - Bank of Valletta
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Malta Business Bureau – <str<strong>on</strong>g>Market</str<strong>on</strong>g> gaps in access <strong>to</strong> finance<br />
April 2013<br />
5.2.9 Q6: Do you see any other important funding instruments emerging in the<br />
future?<br />
Apart from previous questi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>dents’ willingness <strong>to</strong> use other sources <strong>of</strong> financing such as<br />
various forms <strong>of</strong> equity financing, this questi<strong>on</strong> asked resp<strong>on</strong>dents for their opini<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> other<br />
funding opti<strong>on</strong>s, such as private public partnerships, micr<strong>of</strong>inance instituti<strong>on</strong>s, crowd funding and<br />
the c<strong>on</strong>cept <strong>of</strong> a co-operative bank.<br />
Figure 14: Other funding opti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
%age <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
21%<br />
Private Public<br />
Partnership<br />
9%<br />
Micr<strong>of</strong>inance<br />
instituti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Base: All resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />
Note (*): Venture Capital and Business angels were not prompted <strong>to</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />
1%<br />
These additi<strong>on</strong>al funding opti<strong>on</strong>s got few positive resp<strong>on</strong>ses. In additi<strong>on</strong>, 5% <strong>of</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>dents again<br />
menti<strong>on</strong>ed venture capital, without being prompted. Venture capital was already referred <strong>to</strong> in Q6,<br />
whereby resp<strong>on</strong>dents were prompted for their potential interest in other private equity sources,<br />
such as business angels and venture capital funds. In that questi<strong>on</strong>, 24% said they would be<br />
interested in such financing. Other funding opti<strong>on</strong> suggesti<strong>on</strong>s menti<strong>on</strong>ed as replies <strong>to</strong> this questi<strong>on</strong><br />
were export credit guarantees, merchant banks, and financing from insurance firms.<br />
5.2.10 Q7: What are your expectati<strong>on</strong>s regarding assistance <strong>to</strong> be designed in the<br />
next financing period covering 2014 - 2020?<br />
3%<br />
Crowd funding Co-operative<br />
<strong>Bank</strong>s<br />
This open-ended questi<strong>on</strong> was asked <strong>to</strong> all resp<strong>on</strong>dents <strong>to</strong> obtain feedback and comments in<br />
c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> with the next EU Programming Period for 2014-2020. The following points were put<br />
forward:<br />
Extending definiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> eligible costs: the current ec<strong>on</strong>omic situati<strong>on</strong> has put a strain <strong>on</strong><br />
businesses’ cash flow. For this reas<strong>on</strong> the most comm<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se was the desire for eligible<br />
costs for grants <strong>to</strong> include energy costs, cost <strong>of</strong> machinery, staff training expenses and bank<br />
interest.<br />
Greater funding in relati<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> renewable energy: various resp<strong>on</strong>dents also indicated being<br />
willing <strong>to</strong> invest in renewable energy but commented that initial capital outlay was a stumbling<br />
block in this regard. It was therefore suggested that more renewable energy schemes ought <strong>to</strong><br />
be <strong>of</strong>fered, with possible higher co-financing rates.<br />
Page | 54<br />
5%<br />
1%<br />
Venture Capital* Business<br />
Angels*