download - IOA
download - IOA
download - IOA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE THIRD SUMMER SESSION<br />
PART I<br />
THE WORK OF THE 1963 SESSION<br />
Whereas the Summer Session of 1961 was basically of an experimental<br />
nature, it proved invaluable for the formation of the 1962 Session<br />
with more "meat" in the lectures. The 1962 Session proved at least<br />
as equally valuable as a guidance for the organisation and composition<br />
of the 1963 Session.<br />
The 1963 Session was organized with a greater latitude of time<br />
and this allowed for innovations which resulted from the experience<br />
obtained from the previous Summer Session. In the first place every<br />
lecturer was able to hold a Seminar, either immediately following the<br />
lecture, after a break, or the same afternoon, or next day. The questions<br />
put by the students, as also occasionally by the lecturers, proved constructive,<br />
not merely in clarifying points arising out of the lectures<br />
directly, but also on many connex matters, precisely in that direction<br />
which forms the objective of the International Olympic Academy.<br />
In addition two features proved equally as popular as successful.<br />
The first was a radio-type "Brains Trust" at which Mr. John Ketseas,<br />
the Chairman of the I.O.A., took the chair, and at which several lecturers<br />
acted as experts on the various aspects of the Olympic Movement.<br />
Apart from the Curator, the following assisted (alphabetically): Messrs.<br />
E. Fried; W. Korbs; P. McIntosh; Cl. Palaeologos; J. Recia; P. Vialar.<br />
At least equally as popular was a debate held on Parliamentary<br />
lines, with the Curator in the chair. The motion before the "House"<br />
was: - "That this House considers that Sport and Physical Culture<br />
should be compulsory at College and University level". The motion<br />
was carried by a two to one majority. Mr. Peter McIntosh proposed<br />
the motion, which was opposed by Mr. W. Korbs. It was most gratifying<br />
to the Academy to realise the remarkably high level of the speeches<br />
by the students, who were asked to confine their talks to three minutes.<br />
The parliamentary debate was held towards the end of the session,<br />
and the speeches were not only rhetorically good, with plenty of<br />
substance and skill, but indicated that the students were originally<br />
imbued with the Olympic Philosophy, or had absorbed it in the course<br />
of the lectures.<br />
13