23.12.2013 Views

download - IOA

download - IOA

download - IOA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE THIRD SUMMER SESSION<br />

PART I<br />

THE WORK OF THE 1963 SESSION<br />

Whereas the Summer Session of 1961 was basically of an experimental<br />

nature, it proved invaluable for the formation of the 1962 Session<br />

with more "meat" in the lectures. The 1962 Session proved at least<br />

as equally valuable as a guidance for the organisation and composition<br />

of the 1963 Session.<br />

The 1963 Session was organized with a greater latitude of time<br />

and this allowed for innovations which resulted from the experience<br />

obtained from the previous Summer Session. In the first place every<br />

lecturer was able to hold a Seminar, either immediately following the<br />

lecture, after a break, or the same afternoon, or next day. The questions<br />

put by the students, as also occasionally by the lecturers, proved constructive,<br />

not merely in clarifying points arising out of the lectures<br />

directly, but also on many connex matters, precisely in that direction<br />

which forms the objective of the International Olympic Academy.<br />

In addition two features proved equally as popular as successful.<br />

The first was a radio-type "Brains Trust" at which Mr. John Ketseas,<br />

the Chairman of the I.O.A., took the chair, and at which several lecturers<br />

acted as experts on the various aspects of the Olympic Movement.<br />

Apart from the Curator, the following assisted (alphabetically): Messrs.<br />

E. Fried; W. Korbs; P. McIntosh; Cl. Palaeologos; J. Recia; P. Vialar.<br />

At least equally as popular was a debate held on Parliamentary<br />

lines, with the Curator in the chair. The motion before the "House"<br />

was: - "That this House considers that Sport and Physical Culture<br />

should be compulsory at College and University level". The motion<br />

was carried by a two to one majority. Mr. Peter McIntosh proposed<br />

the motion, which was opposed by Mr. W. Korbs. It was most gratifying<br />

to the Academy to realise the remarkably high level of the speeches<br />

by the students, who were asked to confine their talks to three minutes.<br />

The parliamentary debate was held towards the end of the session,<br />

and the speeches were not only rhetorically good, with plenty of<br />

substance and skill, but indicated that the students were originally<br />

imbued with the Olympic Philosophy, or had absorbed it in the course<br />

of the lectures.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!