23.12.2013 Views

download - IOA

download - IOA

download - IOA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Both similarities and differences may appear as we examine some of<br />

the present day motives for the general concern with fitness.<br />

The advent of push button warfare has not eliminated the need<br />

for physically fit troops. Generally speaking the armed forces still require<br />

a higher standard of fitness than is required by civilian employers.<br />

When that level of fitness falls, this trend is reflected in the rate of rejection<br />

of recruits and the fall cannot be tolerated beyond a certain<br />

point by any government which uses its armed forces as instruments<br />

of foreign policy. In some countries the fall in fitness has now reached<br />

a critical point. When the Berlin crisis became acute in 1959 the United<br />

States government had to call up 775,000 men in order to obtain 195,000<br />

additional troops. The rejection of recruits for physical deficiency was<br />

at the rate of 428 per 1,000 - a slightly higher rate than that which preceded<br />

the introduction of military drill into British schools in 1830.<br />

was obtained in World War II. These figures were quoted to Congress<br />

and were used to support the President's Youth Fitness Campaign which<br />

is now being carried on. Some countries anticipate the need for recruits<br />

and take steps to prevent, for military reasons, the debilitating effects<br />

of civilian life. The title of the Russian fitness campaign, initiated in<br />

1930/31 "Ready for Labour and Defence" indicated that military requirements<br />

were held in mind. In Britain the parliamentary debates<br />

on the Physical Training and Recreation Bill in 1937 included several<br />

speeches of Members of Parliament who saw a military value in the<br />

measure which was under discussion. Indeed it is true to say that any<br />

campaign for fitness, come how it may, will derive some of its support<br />

from those who see in it a military value. How much of the support<br />

is of this nature will be very difficult to determine. On the government's<br />

own confession military considerations have been powerful in the United<br />

States Campaign. In Canada, on the other hand the speeches of the<br />

Minister of National Health and Welfare and of the Prime Minister<br />

in initiating their Fitness Campaign in 1962 contained no reference<br />

to military or even paramilitary purposes.<br />

Except in time of war, militarism, however important, is seldom<br />

sufficient to account for a general concern with fitness. In Britain the<br />

Division of Human Physiology within the Medical Research Council<br />

began its work in 1949 by investigating two paramilitary subjects, the<br />

physical development of cadets at the Royal Military College and survival<br />

at sea. The Division went on to investigate problems of mountain climbing<br />

at high altitude and has since carried on investigations into various<br />

aspects of fitness including sporting performances in the Olympic Games<br />

which are of great scientific interest but of very doubtful military value.<br />

The interest of scientists in problems of physical performance has<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!