01.02.2014 Views

People with Disabilities in India: From Commitment to Outcomes

People with Disabilities in India: From Commitment to Outcomes

People with Disabilities in India: From Commitment to Outcomes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 5.8: Employment rates over the life cycle for PWD (LHS) and for non-PWD (RHS)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64<br />

Rural Male<br />

Rural Female<br />

Urban Male<br />

Urban Female<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64<br />

Rural Male<br />

Rural Female<br />

Urban Male<br />

Urban Female<br />

Source: Mitra and Sambamoorthi, us<strong>in</strong>g 58 th round NSS for PWD and 55 th round for non-PWD.<br />

5.8. (ii) Sec<strong>to</strong>ral Composition of PWD Employment: Overall, the sec<strong>to</strong>ral<br />

composition of employment among PWD is not substantially different from the general<br />

population (Table 5.1). The differences of note are: (i) the higher share of PWD workers <strong>in</strong><br />

agriculture-related activities (i.e. the fall <strong>in</strong> share <strong>in</strong> agriculture-related has been less sharp than<br />

for non-PWD over the 1990s); and (ii) the higher share of PWD <strong>in</strong> wholesale/retail trade and<br />

hotels/restaurants (hospitality <strong>in</strong> table). Also of note (not shown) is that disabled people had<br />

around a 10 percent higher rate of self-employment than the general population.<br />

Table 5.1: Sec<strong>to</strong>ral composition of PWD and general employment, early 1990s and early 2000s<br />

Early 2000s<br />

Early 1990s<br />

PWD General PWD General<br />

Agriculture Related 54.9 59.2 49.8 61.7<br />

Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g + m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 12.8 11.4 11.7 11.6<br />

Utilities 0.3 0.3 0.9 3.6<br />

Construction (F) 4.2 4.8 2.5 3.6<br />

Trade/Hospitality 14.1 10.4 10.3 8.0<br />

Transport, s<strong>to</strong>rage and<br />

communications (I) 3.5 3.9 2.7 3.3<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial/RE/Bus<strong>in</strong>ess/Industry 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.1<br />

Community/Social/Personal Services 8.0 8.3 13.9 10.3<br />

Other 1.0 0.4 6.7 3.1<br />

Source: Mitra and Sambamoorthi, based on NSS 58 th , 55 th , 47 th and 50 th rounds.<br />

5.9. The above sec<strong>to</strong>ral disaggregation is useful, but does not reveal much on the more<br />

specific characteristics of employment type and status. Insights <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> these issues for the rural<br />

population are possible from the 30 village survey <strong>in</strong> UP and TN commissioned for this report.<br />

These are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 5.2, which gives the current activity status of work<strong>in</strong>g age males and<br />

females across disability status. Some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g observations emerge:<br />

• men <strong>with</strong> disabilities are less likely <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong> wage/salaried employment, while the opposite is<br />

true for females.<br />

• men and women <strong>with</strong> disabilities are less likely <strong>to</strong> be attend<strong>in</strong>g educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

compared <strong>to</strong> men and women <strong>with</strong>out disabilities.<br />

• for men and women, the share who report not be able <strong>to</strong> work due <strong>to</strong> their disability is<br />

substantial – over a third of work<strong>in</strong>g age PWD men (and almost half of the severe PWD<br />

men), and around one quarter of PWD women (and over a third of severe PWD women).<br />

-88-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!