01.02.2014 Views

People with Disabilities in India: From Commitment to Outcomes

People with Disabilities in India: From Commitment to Outcomes

People with Disabilities in India: From Commitment to Outcomes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

usually above 70 percent. 149 SCA account for most of the f<strong>in</strong>ancial assistance provided by<br />

NHFDC. In most States, the SCA was already <strong>in</strong> place <strong>to</strong> implement the schemes for the SC, ST,<br />

and other economically weaker sections, and has been given the additional responsibility <strong>to</strong><br />

implement NHFDC schemes. NHFDC delegates the power <strong>to</strong> sanction loans up <strong>to</strong> Rs. 1 lakh <strong>to</strong><br />

the SCA and the loan money reaches the beneficiary through the SCA.<br />

5.44. As shown <strong>in</strong> Table 5.10, between 1997 and 2005, the number of NHFDC beneficiaries<br />

has been very low. The number of beneficiaries <strong>in</strong> the period was 19,643. There is considerable<br />

variation across states <strong>in</strong> the number of beneficiaries, <strong>with</strong> states like Bihar and UP hav<strong>in</strong>g very<br />

low coverage (9 and 6 beneficiaries respectively). In addition, disbursements have been very low,<br />

rang<strong>in</strong>g between 23 and 26 percent of available funds <strong>in</strong> 1997-2002, <strong>in</strong> part due <strong>to</strong> long lags<br />

between receipt of funds by SCAs and loan disbursement. 150 In addition, even among the small<br />

client base, there is a strong gender and disability bias. Over 80 percent of beneficiaries are men<br />

and nearly 90 percent of the beneficiaries of schemes are persons <strong>with</strong> orthopaedic disabilities.<br />

The impact of the scheme is dependent on whether the State gives priority <strong>to</strong> disability issues and<br />

on the competence and <strong>in</strong>itiative of the SCA. It is clear that disbursement is driven by<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional fac<strong>to</strong>rs rather than size of disabled population, weakness <strong>in</strong> credit markets, etc.<br />

Table 5.10: Beneficiaries sanctioned and disbursements, NHFDC schemes, 1997-March 2005<br />

Beneficiaries Disbursed (Lakh Rs.)<br />

AP 602 269.5<br />

Assam * 20 2.0<br />

Bihar * 9 0.5<br />

Chattisgarh 136 71.2<br />

Gujarat 1231 550.7<br />

Haryana 2831 1183.5<br />

HP 294 214.4<br />

Karnataka 1177 246.6<br />

Kerala 1022 655.7<br />

MP 1996 841.2<br />

Maharashtra 2716 1636.2<br />

Nagaland 499 242.6<br />

Orissa 2237 935.7<br />

Punjab 42 8.8<br />

Rajasthan 2211 1264.8<br />

TN 274 84.3<br />

Tripura 25 12.3<br />

UP 6 6.4<br />

WB 582 241.3<br />

Chandigarh 122 37.1<br />

Delhi 406 104.7<br />

Pondicherry 953 430.5<br />

Others 252 153.0<br />

Total 19643 9193.0<br />

149 NCPEDP (2003).<br />

150 CAG, 2004.<br />

-103-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!