01.02.2014 Views

People with Disabilities in India: From Commitment to Outcomes

People with Disabilities in India: From Commitment to Outcomes

People with Disabilities in India: From Commitment to Outcomes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Safety Net Schemes<br />

33. Safety nets for PWD offer low coverage and limited f<strong>in</strong>ancial protection. The PWD<br />

Act commits <strong>to</strong> reservations for PWD of not less than 3 percent <strong>in</strong> all poverty alleviation schemes,<br />

but it appears that PWD are well below 3 percent of beneficiaries <strong>in</strong> all schemes. For example,<br />

SGSY coverage rates between 1999 and 2004 were around 0.8 percent of <strong>to</strong>tal program<br />

beneficiaries, account<strong>in</strong>g for only 0.7 percent of the work<strong>in</strong>g PWD population. For IAY, the<br />

beneficiary share <strong>in</strong> recent years has been around the same. For SGRY, <strong>in</strong> the budget years 2002-<br />

04, the share of works for disabled was between 0.2 and 0.9 percent of <strong>to</strong>tal, and the new National<br />

Rural Employment Guarantee Act has dropped the provision for reservations for disabled people.<br />

<strong>India</strong> also has social assistance cash payments for destitute elderly, widows and PWD. All<br />

states/UTs for which data are available have disability social pension schemes, though coverage<br />

<strong>in</strong> different states exhibits wide variations. Nonetheless, it is estimated that around 14 percent of<br />

PWD receive a disability social pension, which makes it the most significant cash transfer<br />

program for this group. While the unemployment allowances for PWD are anticipated <strong>in</strong> the<br />

PWD Act, few states have such schemes.<br />

34. Several fac<strong>to</strong>rs limit the effectiveness of safety net programs. Low program impact is<br />

a product of low awareness among PWD of programs, weak channels for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand (e.g.<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g SHGs of disabled people <strong>to</strong> targeted credit), and <strong>in</strong> many states a lack of focus on the area<br />

of social protection for PWD (as absence of UA and low social pension coverage <strong>in</strong>dicate). The<br />

disability social pension appears <strong>to</strong> date <strong>to</strong> have the most effective outreach <strong>in</strong> several states. In<br />

contrast, the system of reservations under poverty alleviation schemes has clearly failed <strong>to</strong><br />

achieve the desired outcomes.<br />

Disability Insurance Schemes<br />

35. Disability <strong>in</strong>surance schemes have low coverage, <strong>with</strong> f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly from the<br />

budget, but have considerable latent demand. There are two ma<strong>in</strong> problems <strong>with</strong> the current<br />

arrangements for social <strong>in</strong>surance, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g disability <strong>in</strong>surance. The first is related <strong>to</strong> the small<br />

share of the formal sec<strong>to</strong>r. Coverage is therefore low and concentrated <strong>in</strong> the <strong>to</strong>p half of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>come distribution. The second problem relates <strong>to</strong> f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g. In the case of civil servants, the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g comes directly from the budget, <strong>with</strong> no reserves set aside. This is start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> change<br />

however, as a new def<strong>in</strong>ed contribution scheme is be<strong>in</strong>g phased <strong>in</strong> for new civil service hires.<br />

Demand for disability <strong>in</strong>surance among the unorganized sec<strong>to</strong>r is evidenced by the grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

number of SHGs, welfare funds and micro-<strong>in</strong>surance offer<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> this area, as well as public<br />

schemes like JBY which <strong>in</strong> 2006 covered around 3.6 million workers. However, membership <strong>in</strong><br />

group schemes is limited (less than 5 per cent) and not all offer disability benefits. The prevalence<br />

of disability benefits <strong>in</strong> micro-<strong>in</strong>surance schemes appears <strong>to</strong> be even more limited, <strong>with</strong> only one<br />

quarter offered disability benefits (almost always lump sum payments). There is very little solid<br />

analysis available on how well these schemes function.<br />

36. As of 2006, two <strong>in</strong>itiatives may lead <strong>to</strong> significant changes <strong>in</strong> the coverage and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g of disability <strong>in</strong>surance <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>. The first <strong>in</strong>itiative is a bill for social security for the<br />

unorganized sec<strong>to</strong>r, submitted <strong>to</strong> GoI <strong>in</strong> May 2006 by the National Commission on Enterprises <strong>in</strong><br />

the Unorganized Sec<strong>to</strong>r. The proposal <strong>in</strong>cludes benefits for old age, death, maternity, health and<br />

disability, and is proposed <strong>to</strong> be contribu<strong>to</strong>ry. While the proposal is very ambitious, it is the first<br />

such national <strong>in</strong>itiative which grapples <strong>with</strong> the core challenges of adm<strong>in</strong>istration that social<br />

<strong>in</strong>surance for the unorganized sec<strong>to</strong>r implies. Draft legislation has subsequently been prepared by<br />

MoLE which seeks <strong>to</strong> realize the objectives of the NCEUS <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong> a manner consistent <strong>with</strong><br />

fiscal and <strong>in</strong>stitutional capacities. As a precursor <strong>to</strong> this, GoI announced <strong>in</strong> the 2007/08 budget<br />

xix

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!