CockburnCoast - Western Australian Planning Commission
CockburnCoast - Western Australian Planning Commission
CockburnCoast - Western Australian Planning Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>CockburnCoast</strong><br />
3.3.7 Other statutory approvals<br />
In addition to the statutory approvals required through the MRS,<br />
local planning schemes and legislation governing environmental<br />
matters, it is anticipated that the following site-specific approvals will<br />
be required:<br />
• Section 18 clearance under the Aboriginal Heritage Act<br />
1972, where disturbance of Indigenous sites of<br />
significance is proposed;<br />
• development referral to the Heritage Council under the<br />
Heritage of <strong>Western</strong> Australia Act 1990, where any<br />
changes or works are proposed that may affect the<br />
place's heritage significance; and<br />
• Contaminated Sites Act 2003 is the main mechanism for<br />
identifying and managing known and suspected<br />
contaminated sites. The process for addressing<br />
contaminated sites through the Act is discussed in section<br />
4.6.<br />
3.4 Transitional arrangements<br />
Specific consideration needs to be given to the transitional<br />
arrangements, given the potential land use conflict between current<br />
and proposed development. This is particularly the case within the<br />
Darkan and Emplacement precincts due to the extent and nature of<br />
existing developments.<br />
It is a key objective of the structure plan to maintain diversity of land<br />
use and employment in order to create a mixed use environment. It<br />
is a clear desire not to create a bedroom community. Models which<br />
have been used in similar context are East Perth and Subiaco where<br />
transition is accommodated in recognition of existing uses and<br />
users.<br />
Principles:<br />
• Maintain local employment.<br />
• Acknowledge and protect significant local uses.<br />
• Facilitate transition to higher order uses over time.<br />
• Maintain amenity and safety for local population.<br />
Operation:<br />
• Non-conforming use rights apply throughout.<br />
• Mixed use sites which adjoin industrial uses must<br />
demonstrate compliance with noise, dust, odour etc to<br />
EPA standards prior to residential development being<br />
permissible.<br />
• Mixed business sites can maintain existing business,<br />
however can accommodate higher order uses such as<br />
office and commercial.<br />
Implementation:<br />
• District structure plan - principles.<br />
• Local structure plan - detail.<br />
• Development application - compliance.<br />
3.5 Non-conforming use<br />
rights<br />
Non-conforming use rights exist within both the City of Fremantle<br />
and City of Cockburn local planning schemes. Similar protection is<br />
expected with any alternative scheme which may be applied over<br />
the area. The key elements which should be considered are the<br />
protection of the existing approved operation (in compliance with<br />
any conditions which may apply), the expansion of any such use<br />
and the potential termination of the use.<br />
3.5.1 Protection of existing uses<br />
Existing uses are protected to continue operation under current and<br />
valid planning and environmental approvals. Landowners may<br />
continue to operate current approved land uses on existing<br />
premises within the structure plan area until alternative premises<br />
can be secured, the necessary licences gained and construction of<br />
infrastructure can be completed, in the event of relocation of the<br />
operations.<br />
To ensure this is maintained, any proposed change of use adjoining<br />
an existing industrial use needs to demonstrate that:<br />
• the proposed use would comply with any buffer<br />
requirements associated with the existing adjoining use;<br />
• the proposed use/development does not undermine the<br />
potential for the existing operation to continue normal<br />
operational activity; and<br />
• the proposed use/development would not be adversely<br />
affected in terms of odour, safety, noise or visual amenity,<br />
particularly where the proposed use is to include<br />
residential development.<br />
This requirement is proposed to be founded in the information<br />
supplied as part of the local structure plan, however this is required<br />
to be demonstrated at the development stage also.<br />
3.5.2 Expansion of existing use<br />
Although capacity exists for non-conforming uses to expand, such<br />
proposals must be advertised and council must determine that the<br />
proposed expansion would not increase the impact on the locality.<br />
Alternatively, a non-conforming use can seek to be replaced by<br />
another non-conforming use, however this is subject to the<br />
proposed change being deemed to have less impact than the<br />
existing use.<br />
3.5.3 Termination of existing use<br />
There is potential to terminate a non-conforming use, should this be<br />
deemed to be in the broader public interest. Importantly, current<br />
scheme provisions require that any such termination can only take<br />
effect through purchase of the property, payment of compensation<br />
or both.<br />
Clearly the cost associated with termination means that this would<br />
only be applied in circumstances where the existing use is<br />
considered to be detrimental to the extent that it prevents<br />
achievement of critical objectives or presents unacceptable risk<br />
and/or impact to the local area.<br />
district structure plan<br />
53