Essays on supplier responsiveness and buyer firm value - Nyenrode ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ING. (2010). Corporate governance differences. Retrieved September 10, 2011, from http://www.ing.com/Our-Company/About-us/Corporate-Governance/Corporategovernance-and-the-NYSE-listing-standards.htm J.D.POWER. (2010) Press release. Retrieved September 10, 2011, from http://businesscenter.jdpower.com/news/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2010099 Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70. Jayachandran, S., & Varadarajan, R. (2006). Does success diminish competitive responsiveness? Reconciling conflicting perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 284-294. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI user's guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software. Kalwani, M. U., & Narayandas, N. (1995). Long-term manufacturer-supplier relationships: do they pay off for supplier firms? The Journal of Marketing, 59 (January) 1-16. Keh, H. T., Chu, S., & Xu, J. (2006). Efficiency, effectiveness and productivity of marketing in services. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 265- 276. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 1-22. Kim, R.C. & Krolicki, K. (2010, February 5) Apologetic Toyota looking to outside quality input, Reuters, Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/02/05/ us-toyota-idUSTRE6133U820100205 Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: a metaanalytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24-41. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18. Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: a measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (November), 467-477. Koller, T., Goedhart, M. H., Wessels, D., Copeland, T. E., & McKinsey and Company. (2010). Valuation : Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies (5 th ed.). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2001). Principals of Marketing. (9 th ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J., & Wong,V. (2008). Principles of Marketing. (5 th European ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall. Kotler, P., & Pfoertsch, W. (2006). B2B Brand Management. New York: Springer. Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 109-117. Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (1995). The effects of perceived interdependence on dealer attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), 348-356. 140
Langerak, F. (2001). Effects of market orientation on the behaviors of salespersons and purchasers, channel relationships, and performance of manufacturers. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(3), 221-234. Langerak, F. (2003). The effect of market orientation on positional advantage and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(2), 93-115. Langerak, F., Hultink, E. J., & Robben, H. S. J. (2004a). The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(2), 79-94. Langerak, F., Hultink, E. J., & Robben, H. S. J. (2004b). The role of predevelopment activities in the relationship between market orientation and performance. R&D Management, 34(3), 295-309. Langerak, F., Hultink, E. J., & Robben, H. S. J. (2007). The mediating role of new product development in the link between market orientation and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 15(4), 281-305. Leadbeater. C.W., (n.d). Retrieved November 20, 2011, from http://www .notable-quotes.com/p/perception_quotes.html Lehmann, Donald R. and Katherine E. Jocz, eds. (1997), Reflections on the Futures of Marketing. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute. Lisrel. (2012) Retrived August 10, 2012, from http://ssc.utexas.edu/software/faqs/lisrel#lisrel_2 Luo, X. (2007). Consumer negative voice and firm-idiosyncratic stock returns. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 75-88. Lukas, B. A., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). The effect of market orientation on product innovation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 239-247. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130. Marinova, D. (2004). Actualizing innovation effort: the impact of market knowledge diffusion in a dynamic system of competition. Journal of Marketing, 68 (July), 1- 20. Marketwire. (2007, July 6). Linamar Gains Strategic Supplier Status with Caterpillar Inc. Retrieved 8-11, 2011, from http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/linamargains-strategic-supplier-status-with-caterpillar-inc-tsx-lnr-748870.htm Masselink, M. & Noord D.V.P. (2009). The global financial crisis and its effects on the Netherlands. ECFIN Country Focus, 6 (10), 1-7. McAlister, L., Srinivasan, R., & Kim, M. C. (2007). Advertising, research and development, and systematic risk of the firm. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 35-48. McKinsey. (2010). The challenges ahead for supply chains: McKinsey Global Survey results. McKinsey Quarterly Retrieved May 1, 2012, from http://www .mckinseyquarterly.com/Operations/Supply_Chain_Logistics/The_challenges_ahe ad_for_supply_chains_McKinsey_Global_Survey_results_2706 141
Page 2 and 3:
ISBN 978-90-8980-055-8 © M. Abrahi
Page 4 and 5:
Examination Committee Supervisor: P
Page 6 and 7:
2.3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPTUAL M
Page 8 and 9:
5.1 RESEARCH FINDINGS 114 5.2 OVERA
Page 10 and 11:
List of Tables Table 2.1 Representa
Page 12 and 13:
PREFACE Oscar Wilde once said, “I
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1 Introduction to the Thesi
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1.1 Mckinsey Survey Results
Page 18 and 19:
1.4 Scope PhD thesis This thesis fo
Page 20 and 21:
Netherlands. We used the maximum li
Page 22 and 23:
2.1 Introduction A central tenant o
Page 24 and 25:
only provide an assessment of the s
Page 26 and 27:
Table 2.1 highlights several promin
Page 28 and 29:
other hand, they later argue that m
Page 30 and 31:
Therefore, there is a convergence i
Page 32 and 33:
usiness performance, firms need to
Page 34 and 35:
means is that the more better a str
Page 36 and 37:
Supplier responsiveness or market o
Page 38 and 39:
Naryandas, 1995). Further, idiosync
Page 40 and 41:
They might also include the ease wi
Page 42 and 43:
they ask about intimate supplier in
Page 44 and 45:
Table 2.2 Modified Items of the MAR
Page 46:
Table 2.2 Modified Items of the MAR
Page 49 and 50:
market intelligence, offering flexi
Page 51 and 52:
We considered several scales before
Page 53 and 54:
Table 2.7 Component Matrix Buyer Sa
Page 55 and 56:
een monitored to make sure they gav
Page 57 and 58:
satisfaction and strategic supplier
Page 59 and 60:
2.5 Measurement Model For creating
Page 61 and 62:
In the third step, we used maximum
Page 63 and 64:
incremental fit index (IFI) is one
Page 65 and 66:
ange of 100-150 (Hair et al., 2006,
Page 67 and 68:
indicator that has a link to custom
Page 69 and 70:
and strengths and their stock marke
Page 71 and 72:
accompanies any innovation, accordi
Page 73 and 74:
important finding because it provid
Page 75 and 76:
3.1 Introduction The Netherlands, d
Page 77 and 78:
possibility that firm size may infl
Page 79 and 80:
Figure 3.1 The Netherlands and Unit
Page 81 and 82:
comprehensive agreement on each oth
Page 83 and 84:
Why do we pay more for an orange wi
Page 85 and 86:
constructs, for cross-cultural fact
Page 87 and 88:
will discuss the SEM analysis of th
Page 89 and 90: BFV Hypothesis 4 IdRR->SBV Hypothes
Page 91 and 92: products. Overall, the effects of s
Page 93 and 94: more diverse comparison. China is a
Page 95 and 96: Chapter 4 The Quest for Performance
Page 97 and 98: insurance premiums. Hence, perceptu
Page 99 and 100: theoretical contribution regarding
Page 101 and 102: should reinforce objective measures
Page 103 and 104: Table 4.2 Standardized Regression W
Page 105 and 106: Table 4.5 SEM Results Construct Dir
Page 107 and 108: 4.7 Discussion We start this discus
Page 109 and 110: Jaowrski and Kohli (1993) provided
Page 111 and 112: Using the findings of our current s
Page 113 and 114: iii) iv) Indeed, there may not be m
Page 115 and 116: uyer firm performance through a ser
Page 117 and 118: specifically highlighted the import
Page 119 and 120: 5.5 Practical Implications From a m
Page 121 and 122: Summary in English This dissertatio
Page 123 and 124: is that, when developing marketing
Page 125 and 126: isk by 0.98 standard deviations. Su
Page 127 and 128: collectivist culture and a Confucia
Page 129 and 130: Overwegende dat Verhoef en Leeflang
Page 131 and 132: van de waarde te communiceren dat d
Page 133 and 134: erkennen dat dit niet altijd een mo
Page 135 and 136: ij de vraag of cultureel risico voo
Page 137 and 138: Businessweek. (2012). S&P/BusinessW
Page 139: -industry-09012011.html Grewal, R.,
Page 143 and 144: Quelch, J. (2007). How to brand an
Page 145 and 146: Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H
Page 147 and 148: 1. The name of the company where yo
Page 149 and 150: 9.The supplier seems to have good i
Page 151 and 152: 17. The supplier takes a very long
Page 153 and 154: 25. If the supplier were to find ou
Page 155 and 156: 33.Does your strategic supplier als
Page 157 and 158: 41.To what degree do those specific
Page 159 and 160: Supplier Brand Value 51.How likely
Page 161 and 162: Appendix B Scatter Plot Diagrams fo
Page 163 and 164: 163
show all

Essays on supplier responsiveness and buyer firm value - Nyenrode ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?