Essays on supplier responsiveness and buyer firm value - Nyenrode ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

McNamara, C. P. (1972). The present status of the marketing concept. Journal of Marketing, 36 (January), 50-57. McQuiston, D. H. (2004). Successful branding of a commodity product: The case of RAEX LASER steel. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(4), 345-354. Mitchell, V. W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1/2), 163-195. Morgan, N. A., Anderson, E. W., & Mittal, V. (2005). Understanding firms' customer satisfaction information usage. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 131-151. Mudambi, S. M. D., Doyle, P., & Wong, V. (1997). An exploration of branding in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(5), 433-446. Mudambi, S. (2002). Branding Importance in Business-to-Business Markets: Three Buyer Clusters. Industrial Marketing Management, 31 (6), 525-533. Naidu, G., & Narayana, C. L. (1991). How marketing oriented are hospitals in a declining market? Journal of Health Care Marketing, 11(1), 23. Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 137-153. Narayandas, D. (2005). Building loyalty in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(9), 131-139. Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35. Nightingale, A. (2009, April 29, 2009). Oil Floods Rotterdam, Europe's Largest Port, as demand drops, Bloomberg. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/ apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ae.YS7TBN0jY Norris, D. G. (1992). Ingredient branding: a strategy option with multiple beneficiaries. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(3), 19-31. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469. Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (3), 418-430. Pauwels, K., Ambler, T., Clark, B., LaPointe, P., Reibstein, D., Skiera, B.,Wiesel, T. (2008). Dashboards and Marketing: why, what, how and what research is needed? Marketing Science Institute, 08-203. Pelham, A. M., & Wilson, D.T. (1996). A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Market Structure, Firm Structure, Strategy, and Market Orientation Culture on Dimensions of SmallFirm Perfonnance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24 (1),27-A3. Phillips, L. W. (1981). Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: A methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(4), 395-415. Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149-160. Pulendran, S., Speed, R., & Widing, R. E. (2000). The antecedents and consequences of market orientation in Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 25(2), 119. 142
Quelch, J. (2007). How to brand an ingredient. HBR Blog Network. Retrieved from http://blogs.hbr.org/quelch/2007/10/how_to_brand_an_ingredient_1.html Rajan, M. V., & Reichelstein, S. (2006). Subjective performance indicators and discretionary bonus pools. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 585-618. Reeves, M., & Deimler, M. (2011). Adaptability: The new competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 89(7/8), 134-141. Rego, L. L., Billet, M. T. and Morgan, N. A. (2009) Consumer-Based Brand Equity and Firm Risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6): 47-60. Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 261-279. Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56-61. Rotterdam's Economy. (2011) Retrieved 7-10-2011, 2011, from http://www.macalester.edu/courses/geog261/Otte_Rotterdam/Rotterdam Economy.html Ruekert, R. W., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1984). Reliability and validity of alternative measures of channel member satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(2), 226-233. San Miguel, J. G. (1977). The reliability of R&D data in Compustat and 10-K reports. The Accounting Review, 52(3), 638-641. Sanzo, M. J., Santos, M. L., Vazquez, R., & Alvarez, L. I. (2003). The effect of market orientation on buyer-seller relationship satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(4), 327-345. Saxton, T. (1997). The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 443-461. Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Ram, S. (2000). The Impact of Organizational and Environmental Variables on Strategic Market Orientation. Journal of Global Marketing, 13(3), 111-127. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row. Schmitt, E. (2009). The Profits and Perils of Supplying to Wal-Mart. Businessweek Retrieved May 20, 2012, from http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/ content/jul2009/sb20090714_270767.htm Scholz, R. (2009). The Constant Hit. Porsche Consulting Magazine. Retrieved November 5, 2011, from http://www.porscheconsulting.com/pco/en/press/ porscheconsultingmagazine/issue08/ Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values: Sage Publications, Inc. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. Shaw, J., Giglierano, J., & Kallis, J. (1991). Marketing complex technical products: the importance of intangible attributes. ISA Transactions, 30(3), 45-53. 143
Page 2 and 3:
ISBN 978-90-8980-055-8 © M. Abrahi
Page 4 and 5:
Examination Committee Supervisor: P
Page 6 and 7:
2.3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPTUAL M
Page 8 and 9:
5.1 RESEARCH FINDINGS 114 5.2 OVERA
Page 10 and 11:
List of Tables Table 2.1 Representa
Page 12 and 13:
PREFACE Oscar Wilde once said, “I
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1 Introduction to the Thesi
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1.1 Mckinsey Survey Results
Page 18 and 19:
1.4 Scope PhD thesis This thesis fo
Page 20 and 21:
Netherlands. We used the maximum li
Page 22 and 23:
2.1 Introduction A central tenant o
Page 24 and 25:
only provide an assessment of the s
Page 26 and 27:
Table 2.1 highlights several promin
Page 28 and 29:
other hand, they later argue that m
Page 30 and 31:
Therefore, there is a convergence i
Page 32 and 33:
usiness performance, firms need to
Page 34 and 35:
means is that the more better a str
Page 36 and 37:
Supplier responsiveness or market o
Page 38 and 39:
Naryandas, 1995). Further, idiosync
Page 40 and 41:
They might also include the ease wi
Page 42 and 43:
they ask about intimate supplier in
Page 44 and 45:
Table 2.2 Modified Items of the MAR
Page 46:
Table 2.2 Modified Items of the MAR
Page 49 and 50:
market intelligence, offering flexi
Page 51 and 52:
We considered several scales before
Page 53 and 54:
Table 2.7 Component Matrix Buyer Sa
Page 55 and 56:
een monitored to make sure they gav
Page 57 and 58:
satisfaction and strategic supplier
Page 59 and 60:
2.5 Measurement Model For creating
Page 61 and 62:
In the third step, we used maximum
Page 63 and 64:
incremental fit index (IFI) is one
Page 65 and 66:
ange of 100-150 (Hair et al., 2006,
Page 67 and 68:
indicator that has a link to custom
Page 69 and 70:
and strengths and their stock marke
Page 71 and 72:
accompanies any innovation, accordi
Page 73 and 74:
important finding because it provid
Page 75 and 76:
3.1 Introduction The Netherlands, d
Page 77 and 78:
possibility that firm size may infl
Page 79 and 80:
Figure 3.1 The Netherlands and Unit
Page 81 and 82:
comprehensive agreement on each oth
Page 83 and 84:
Why do we pay more for an orange wi
Page 85 and 86:
constructs, for cross-cultural fact
Page 87 and 88:
will discuss the SEM analysis of th
Page 89 and 90:
BFV Hypothesis 4 IdRR->SBV Hypothes
Page 91 and 92: products. Overall, the effects of s
Page 93 and 94: more diverse comparison. China is a
Page 95 and 96: Chapter 4 The Quest for Performance
Page 97 and 98: insurance premiums. Hence, perceptu
Page 99 and 100: theoretical contribution regarding
Page 101 and 102: should reinforce objective measures
Page 103 and 104: Table 4.2 Standardized Regression W
Page 105 and 106: Table 4.5 SEM Results Construct Dir
Page 107 and 108: 4.7 Discussion We start this discus
Page 109 and 110: Jaowrski and Kohli (1993) provided
Page 111 and 112: Using the findings of our current s
Page 113 and 114: iii) iv) Indeed, there may not be m
Page 115 and 116: uyer firm performance through a ser
Page 117 and 118: specifically highlighted the import
Page 119 and 120: 5.5 Practical Implications From a m
Page 121 and 122: Summary in English This dissertatio
Page 123 and 124: is that, when developing marketing
Page 125 and 126: isk by 0.98 standard deviations. Su
Page 127 and 128: collectivist culture and a Confucia
Page 129 and 130: Overwegende dat Verhoef en Leeflang
Page 131 and 132: van de waarde te communiceren dat d
Page 133 and 134: erkennen dat dit niet altijd een mo
Page 135 and 136: ij de vraag of cultureel risico voo
Page 137 and 138: Businessweek. (2012). S&P/BusinessW
Page 139 and 140: -industry-09012011.html Grewal, R.,
Page 141: Langerak, F. (2001). Effects of mar
Page 145 and 146: Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H
Page 147 and 148: 1. The name of the company where yo
Page 149 and 150: 9.The supplier seems to have good i
Page 151 and 152: 17. The supplier takes a very long
Page 153 and 154: 25. If the supplier were to find ou
Page 155 and 156: 33.Does your strategic supplier als
Page 157 and 158: 41.To what degree do those specific
Page 159 and 160: Supplier Brand Value 51.How likely
Page 161 and 162: Appendix B Scatter Plot Diagrams fo
Page 163 and 164: 163
show all

Essays on supplier responsiveness and buyer firm value - Nyenrode ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?