Essays on supplier responsiveness and buyer firm value - Nyenrode ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Eggert, A., & Ulaga, W. (2002). Customer perceived value: a substitute for satisfaction in business markets? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(2/3), 107-118. Ellis, P. D. (2006). Market Orientation and Performance: A Meta Analysis and Cross National Comparisons. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1089-1107. Erdem, T., Zhao, Y., & Valenzuela, A. (2004). Performance of store brands: A crosscountry analysis of consumer store-brand preferences, perceptions, and risk. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 86-100. Esslemont, D., & Lewis, T. (1991). Some empirical tests of the marketing concept. Marketing Bulletin, 2, 1-7. Farzad, R. (July 29, 2011). Apple’s earnings power befuddles Wall Street. Businessweek. Retrieved on January 15, 2012 from http://www.nbcnews.com/id/43946621/ ns/business-us_business/?ocid=twitter Foer, J. (2011). Moonwalking with Einstein: the art and science of remembering everything. New York: Penguin Press. Foreign Direct Investment. (2010). Retrieved 7-10-2011, 2011, from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s1291.pdf Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7-18. Frazier, G. L., Maltz, E., Antia, K. D., & Rindfleisch, A. (2009). Distributor sharing of strategic information with suppliers. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 31-43. Gebhardt, G. F., Carpenter, G. S., & Sherry Jr, J. F. (2006). Creating a market orientation: A longitudinal, multifirm, grounded analysis of cultural transformation. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 37-55. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1999). A meta-analysis of satisfaction in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2), 223-238. Ghosh, M., & John, G. (2009). When Should Original Equipment Manufacturers Use Branded Component Contracts with Suppliers? Journal of Marketing Research, 46(5), 597-611. Girotra, K., & Netessine, S. (2011). How to build risk into your business model. Harvard Business Review, 89 (5),100-105. Gonzalez-Benito, O., & Gonz·lez-Benito, J. (2005). Cultural vs. operational market orientation and objective vs. subjective performance: perspective of production and operations. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 797-829. Gordon, G. L., Calantone, R. J., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (1993). Brand equity in the business-to-business sector: an exploratory study. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 2(3), 4-16. Goyal, A., & Santa‐Clara, P. (2003). Idiosyncratic risk matters! The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 975-1008. Greeley, B. (2011, September 01). The God Clause and the Reinsurance Industry Weekly. Businessweek. Retrieved 1-11, 2011, from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/the-god-clause-and-the-reinsurance 138
-industry-09012011.html Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. (2001). Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 67-80. Guerrera, F. (2009, March 13). Welch denounces corporate obsessions, Financial Times. Retrieved November 30, 2009 from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/3ca8ec2e- 0f70-11de-ba10-0000779fd2ac.html - axzz1eLYiVbPI Hague, P. N., & Jackson, P. (1994). The power of industrial brands: an effective route to competitive advantage. Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate analysis. London: Pearson-Prentice Hall. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62 (October), 30-45. Harris, L. C. (2001). Market orientation and performance: objective and subjective empirical evidence from UK companies. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 17-43. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad. Organizational dynamics, 9(1), 42-63. Hofstede, G. H. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in workrelated values (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Hofstede, G.H. & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational dynamics, 16(4), 4-21. Hofstede, G. H. (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Hofstede, G. H. (2003). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, Inc. Holt, D. B., Quelch, J. A., & Taylor, E. L. (2004). How global brands compete. Harvard Business Review, 82(9), 68-75. Hooley, G. J., Lynch, J. E., & Shepherd, J. (1990). The marketing concept: putting the theory into practice. European Journal of Marketing, 24(9), 7-24. House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 3-10. Hutton, J. G. (1997). A study of brand equity in an organizational-buying context. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(6), 428-439. 139
Page 2 and 3:
ISBN 978-90-8980-055-8 © M. Abrahi
Page 4 and 5:
Examination Committee Supervisor: P
Page 6 and 7:
2.3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPTUAL M
Page 8 and 9:
5.1 RESEARCH FINDINGS 114 5.2 OVERA
Page 10 and 11:
List of Tables Table 2.1 Representa
Page 12 and 13:
PREFACE Oscar Wilde once said, “I
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1 Introduction to the Thesi
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1.1 Mckinsey Survey Results
Page 18 and 19:
1.4 Scope PhD thesis This thesis fo
Page 20 and 21:
Netherlands. We used the maximum li
Page 22 and 23:
2.1 Introduction A central tenant o
Page 24 and 25:
only provide an assessment of the s
Page 26 and 27:
Table 2.1 highlights several promin
Page 28 and 29:
other hand, they later argue that m
Page 30 and 31:
Therefore, there is a convergence i
Page 32 and 33:
usiness performance, firms need to
Page 34 and 35:
means is that the more better a str
Page 36 and 37:
Supplier responsiveness or market o
Page 38 and 39:
Naryandas, 1995). Further, idiosync
Page 40 and 41:
They might also include the ease wi
Page 42 and 43:
they ask about intimate supplier in
Page 44 and 45:
Table 2.2 Modified Items of the MAR
Page 46:
Table 2.2 Modified Items of the MAR
Page 49 and 50:
market intelligence, offering flexi
Page 51 and 52:
We considered several scales before
Page 53 and 54:
Table 2.7 Component Matrix Buyer Sa
Page 55 and 56:
een monitored to make sure they gav
Page 57 and 58:
satisfaction and strategic supplier
Page 59 and 60:
2.5 Measurement Model For creating
Page 61 and 62:
In the third step, we used maximum
Page 63 and 64:
incremental fit index (IFI) is one
Page 65 and 66:
ange of 100-150 (Hair et al., 2006,
Page 67 and 68:
indicator that has a link to custom
Page 69 and 70:
and strengths and their stock marke
Page 71 and 72:
accompanies any innovation, accordi
Page 73 and 74:
important finding because it provid
Page 75 and 76:
3.1 Introduction The Netherlands, d
Page 77 and 78:
possibility that firm size may infl
Page 79 and 80:
Figure 3.1 The Netherlands and Unit
Page 81 and 82:
comprehensive agreement on each oth
Page 83 and 84:
Why do we pay more for an orange wi
Page 85 and 86:
constructs, for cross-cultural fact
Page 87 and 88: will discuss the SEM analysis of th
Page 89 and 90: BFV Hypothesis 4 IdRR->SBV Hypothes
Page 91 and 92: products. Overall, the effects of s
Page 93 and 94: more diverse comparison. China is a
Page 95 and 96: Chapter 4 The Quest for Performance
Page 97 and 98: insurance premiums. Hence, perceptu
Page 99 and 100: theoretical contribution regarding
Page 101 and 102: should reinforce objective measures
Page 103 and 104: Table 4.2 Standardized Regression W
Page 105 and 106: Table 4.5 SEM Results Construct Dir
Page 107 and 108: 4.7 Discussion We start this discus
Page 109 and 110: Jaowrski and Kohli (1993) provided
Page 111 and 112: Using the findings of our current s
Page 113 and 114: iii) iv) Indeed, there may not be m
Page 115 and 116: uyer firm performance through a ser
Page 117 and 118: specifically highlighted the import
Page 119 and 120: 5.5 Practical Implications From a m
Page 121 and 122: Summary in English This dissertatio
Page 123 and 124: is that, when developing marketing
Page 125 and 126: isk by 0.98 standard deviations. Su
Page 127 and 128: collectivist culture and a Confucia
Page 129 and 130: Overwegende dat Verhoef en Leeflang
Page 131 and 132: van de waarde te communiceren dat d
Page 133 and 134: erkennen dat dit niet altijd een mo
Page 135 and 136: ij de vraag of cultureel risico voo
Page 137: Businessweek. (2012). S&P/BusinessW
Page 141 and 142: Langerak, F. (2001). Effects of mar
Page 143 and 144: Quelch, J. (2007). How to brand an
Page 145 and 146: Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H
Page 147 and 148: 1. The name of the company where yo
Page 149 and 150: 9.The supplier seems to have good i
Page 151 and 152: 17. The supplier takes a very long
Page 153 and 154: 25. If the supplier were to find ou
Page 155 and 156: 33.Does your strategic supplier als
Page 157 and 158: 41.To what degree do those specific
Page 159 and 160: Supplier Brand Value 51.How likely
Page 161 and 162: Appendix B Scatter Plot Diagrams fo
Page 163 and 164: 163
show all

Essays on supplier responsiveness and buyer firm value - Nyenrode ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?