Siemans (2013) Leveraging strategic <strong>supplier</strong>s for strategic innovati<strong>on</strong>. Retrieved January 11, 2013, from http://www.plm.automati<strong>on</strong>.siemens.com/ zh_cn/Images/7562_tcm78-4602.pdf Siguaw, J. A., Simps<strong>on</strong>, P. M., & Baker, T. L. (1998). Effects of <strong>supplier</strong> market orientati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> distributor market orientati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> the channel relati<strong>on</strong>ship: the distributor perspective. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 99-111. Singh, M., Faircloth, S., & Nejadmalayeri, A. (2005). Capital market impact of product marketing strategy: evidence from the relati<strong>on</strong>ship between advertising expenses <strong>and</strong> cost of capital. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 432-444. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive envir<strong>on</strong>ment moderate the market orientati<strong>on</strong>-performance relati<strong>on</strong>ship? Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 46-55. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> the learning organizati<strong>on</strong>. The Journal of Marketing, 59 (July), 63-74. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1998). Customer led <strong>and</strong> market oriented: let's not c<strong>on</strong>fuse the two. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 1001-1006. Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D. M. (2009). Marketing <strong>and</strong> <strong>firm</strong> <strong>value</strong>: Metrics, methods, findings, <strong>and</strong> future directi<strong>on</strong>s. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(3), 293-312. Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets <strong>and</strong> shareholder <strong>value</strong>: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2-18. Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1999). Marketing, business processes, <strong>and</strong> shareholder <strong>value</strong>: an organizati<strong>on</strong>ally embedded view of marketing activities <strong>and</strong> the discipline of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 168- 179. Steinman, C., Deshp<strong>and</strong>e, R., & Farley, J. U. (2000). Bey<strong>on</strong>d market orientati<strong>on</strong>: when customers <strong>and</strong> <strong>supplier</strong>s disagree. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 109-119. Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C., & Ch<strong>and</strong>y, R. K. (2009). Radical innovati<strong>on</strong> across nati<strong>on</strong>s: the preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3-23. Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1993). Customer intimacy <strong>and</strong> other <strong>value</strong> disciplines. Harvard Business Review, 71, 84-84. Trompenaars, F. (1994). Riding the waves of culture: Underst<strong>and</strong>ing diversity in global business. New York: Irwin. TSE, C. B. L. (1995). The effect of marketing orientati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> company performance in the service sector: a comparative study of the hotel industry in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. Journal of Internati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>sumer Marketing, 8(2), 77-87. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics <strong>and</strong> biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. USC Marshall. (2008, August 5). Gerard Tellis - Innovati<strong>on</strong> [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRwy6n-XcmA U.S. Trade Balance. (2012). U.S. Trade Balance, by Partner Country 2012 in descending order of trade turnover (imports plus exports). Retrieved October 7, 2012, from http://dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/cy_m3_run.asp 144
Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009). Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the marketing department's influence within the <strong>firm</strong>. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 14-37. Verhees, F.J.H.M., & Meulenberg, M.T.G. (2004). Market Orientati<strong>on</strong>, Innovativeness, Product Innovati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Performance in Small Firms. Journal of Small Business Management. Vol. 42 (2), pp.134–54. V<strong>on</strong> Hippel, E. A. (1976). The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovati<strong>on</strong> process. Research Policy 5, no. 3, 212–239. Voss, Glenn B. <strong>and</strong> Zannie G. Voss (2000), Strategic Orientati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> Firm Performance in an Artistic Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, Journal of Marketing, 64 (January), 67-83. Weber, E., & Hsee, C. (1999). Cross-nati<strong>on</strong>al differences in risk preference <strong>and</strong> lay predicti<strong>on</strong>s. Journal of Behavioral Decisi<strong>on</strong> Making, 12, 165-179. Whitwell, S. (2005). Ingredient br<strong>and</strong>ing case study: Intel. Retrieved January 22, 2011, from http://www.intangiblebusiness.com/Br<strong>and</strong>-Services/Marketingservices/News/Ingredient-br<strong>and</strong>ing-case-study-Intel~466.html Wierenga, B., & Van Bruggen, G. H. (1997). The integrati<strong>on</strong> of marketing problemsolving modes <strong>and</strong> marketing management support systems. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 21-37. Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market: Harvard Business Press. Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> technology-<strong>and</strong> market-based breakthrough innovati<strong>on</strong>s. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42-60. 145
- Page 2 and 3:
ISBN 978-90-8980-055-8 © M. Abrahi
- Page 4 and 5:
Examination Committee Supervisor: P
- Page 6 and 7:
2.3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPTUAL M
- Page 8 and 9:
5.1 RESEARCH FINDINGS 114 5.2 OVERA
- Page 10 and 11:
List of Tables Table 2.1 Representa
- Page 12 and 13:
PREFACE Oscar Wilde once said, “I
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1 Introduction to the Thesi
- Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1.1 Mckinsey Survey Results
- Page 18 and 19:
1.4 Scope PhD thesis This thesis fo
- Page 20 and 21:
Netherlands. We used the maximum li
- Page 22 and 23:
2.1 Introduction A central tenant o
- Page 24 and 25:
only provide an assessment of the s
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 2.1 highlights several promin
- Page 28 and 29:
other hand, they later argue that m
- Page 30 and 31:
Therefore, there is a convergence i
- Page 32 and 33:
usiness performance, firms need to
- Page 34 and 35:
means is that the more better a str
- Page 36 and 37:
Supplier responsiveness or market o
- Page 38 and 39:
Naryandas, 1995). Further, idiosync
- Page 40 and 41:
They might also include the ease wi
- Page 42 and 43:
they ask about intimate supplier in
- Page 44 and 45:
Table 2.2 Modified Items of the MAR
- Page 46:
Table 2.2 Modified Items of the MAR
- Page 49 and 50:
market intelligence, offering flexi
- Page 51 and 52:
We considered several scales before
- Page 53 and 54:
Table 2.7 Component Matrix Buyer Sa
- Page 55 and 56:
een monitored to make sure they gav
- Page 57 and 58:
satisfaction and strategic supplier
- Page 59 and 60:
2.5 Measurement Model For creating
- Page 61 and 62:
In the third step, we used maximum
- Page 63 and 64:
incremental fit index (IFI) is one
- Page 65 and 66:
ange of 100-150 (Hair et al., 2006,
- Page 67 and 68:
indicator that has a link to custom
- Page 69 and 70:
and strengths and their stock marke
- Page 71 and 72:
accompanies any innovation, accordi
- Page 73 and 74:
important finding because it provid
- Page 75 and 76:
3.1 Introduction The Netherlands, d
- Page 77 and 78:
possibility that firm size may infl
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 3.1 The Netherlands and Unit
- Page 81 and 82:
comprehensive agreement on each oth
- Page 83 and 84:
Why do we pay more for an orange wi
- Page 85 and 86:
constructs, for cross-cultural fact
- Page 87 and 88:
will discuss the SEM analysis of th
- Page 89 and 90:
BFV Hypothesis 4 IdRR->SBV Hypothes
- Page 91 and 92:
products. Overall, the effects of s
- Page 93 and 94: more diverse comparison. China is a
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 4 The Quest for Performance
- Page 97 and 98: insurance premiums. Hence, perceptu
- Page 99 and 100: theoretical contribution regarding
- Page 101 and 102: should reinforce objective measures
- Page 103 and 104: Table 4.2 Standardized Regression W
- Page 105 and 106: Table 4.5 SEM Results Construct Dir
- Page 107 and 108: 4.7 Discussion We start this discus
- Page 109 and 110: Jaowrski and Kohli (1993) provided
- Page 111 and 112: Using the findings of our current s
- Page 113 and 114: iii) iv) Indeed, there may not be m
- Page 115 and 116: uyer firm performance through a ser
- Page 117 and 118: specifically highlighted the import
- Page 119 and 120: 5.5 Practical Implications From a m
- Page 121 and 122: Summary in English This dissertatio
- Page 123 and 124: is that, when developing marketing
- Page 125 and 126: isk by 0.98 standard deviations. Su
- Page 127 and 128: collectivist culture and a Confucia
- Page 129 and 130: Overwegende dat Verhoef en Leeflang
- Page 131 and 132: van de waarde te communiceren dat d
- Page 133 and 134: erkennen dat dit niet altijd een mo
- Page 135 and 136: ij de vraag of cultureel risico voo
- Page 137 and 138: Businessweek. (2012). S&P/BusinessW
- Page 139 and 140: -industry-09012011.html Grewal, R.,
- Page 141 and 142: Langerak, F. (2001). Effects of mar
- Page 143: Quelch, J. (2007). How to brand an
- Page 147 and 148: 1. The name of the company where yo
- Page 149 and 150: 9.The supplier seems to have good i
- Page 151 and 152: 17. The supplier takes a very long
- Page 153 and 154: 25. If the supplier were to find ou
- Page 155 and 156: 33.Does your strategic supplier als
- Page 157 and 158: 41.To what degree do those specific
- Page 159 and 160: Supplier Brand Value 51.How likely
- Page 161 and 162: Appendix B Scatter Plot Diagrams fo
- Page 163 and 164: 163