28.06.2014 Views

Discussion

Discussion

Discussion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AS 65500<br />

Sub-AS 65501<br />

RouterF<br />

192.168.16.1<br />

RouterD<br />

192.168.14.1<br />

AS 65505<br />

RouterE<br />

192.168.15.1<br />

RouterJ<br />

192.168.17.1<br />

RouterH<br />

192.168.18.1<br />

RouterC<br />

192.168.11.1<br />

RouterG<br />

192.168.19.1<br />

Sub-AS 65502<br />

RouterB<br />

192.168.12.1<br />

RouterA<br />

192.168.13.1<br />

Figure 13-4. Confederation within the AS<br />

See Also<br />

RFC 1965, Autonomous System Confederations for BGP; RFC 1966, BGP Route<br />

Reflection: An Alternative to Full-Mesh IBGP; RFC 2796, BGP Route Reflection; RFC<br />

3065, Autonomous System Confederations for BGP<br />

13.12 Mitigating Route Instabilities with Route Flap<br />

Damping<br />

Problem<br />

You want to deal with potential route instabilities caused by routes being withdrawn<br />

in a series of BGP Update messages only to be readvertised as active routes a few<br />

minutes later when an intermittently failing link is restored.<br />

Mitigating Route Instabilities with Route Flap Damping | 457<br />

This is the Title of the Book, eMatter Edition<br />

Copyright © 2008 O’Reilly & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!