02.09.2014 Views

Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME

Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME

Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix B<br />

Appendix B<br />

Checking <strong>Protocol</strong> <strong>for</strong> Contaminated Ingestion Resulting<br />

from Produce, Meat, <strong>and</strong> Milk Produced at Remediated<br />

Residential <strong>and</strong> Agricultural Sites<br />

1.0 Background <strong>and</strong> Application<br />

<strong>Human</strong>s can be indirectly exposed to contaminants in soils through food-chain contamination <strong>of</strong><br />

produce, meat, <strong>and</strong> milk. For agricultural l<strong>and</strong> use, it is likely that some meat, produce (i.e.,<br />

vegetables), <strong>and</strong> milk will be produced <strong>and</strong> consumed on-site. In <strong>the</strong> residential setting, it is also<br />

possible that a backyard garden may provide a significant portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> produce consumed by a family.<br />

To ensure that soil remediation guidelines do not result in an unacceptable contribution to total daily<br />

intake <strong>of</strong> contaminants via homegrown produce, meat, <strong>and</strong> milk, it is necessary to compare <strong>the</strong><br />

expected intake <strong>of</strong> contaminants from <strong>the</strong>se sources with <strong>the</strong> total intake.<br />

The concentration estimated to occur in food from soils contaminated at <strong>the</strong> preliminary soil guideline<br />

concentration must be less than <strong>the</strong> maximum residue limit (MRL) published under <strong>the</strong> Food <strong>and</strong> Drug<br />

Act. If no MRL exists <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> chemical under study, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> total daily intake estimated by <strong>the</strong><br />

procedure outlined in this appendix must not exceed total background exposure from food (i.e.,<br />

estimated daily intake) by more than 20% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> TDI <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> EDI, <strong>for</strong> noncarcinogens.<br />

For carcinogens, total contaminant intake must not exceed <strong>the</strong> risk specific dose (RSD)<br />

<strong>for</strong> a cancer risk <strong>of</strong> 10 -6 .<br />

The procedure <strong>and</strong> assumptions <strong>for</strong> estimating <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> a contaminant in food <strong>and</strong> daily<br />

intake is described in Section 1.1. The protocol provides an estimate <strong>of</strong> bioconcentration <strong>of</strong><br />

contaminants into, <strong>and</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong>, <strong>the</strong>se foods, in relation to <strong>the</strong> assumptions outlined in Section<br />

1.1. This procedure applies only to non-polar organic contaminants. Methods <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> bioconcentration <strong>of</strong> metals, or o<strong>the</strong>r chemicals not typically known to bioaccumulate, should be<br />

considered on a chemical-by- chemical basis.<br />

No detailed data about <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> food Canadians consumed from local origin are available.<br />

However, it is believed to be a substantial contribution to total daily intake, especially in an agricultural<br />

setting. For example, a 1985 survey in Quebec indicates that 42% <strong>of</strong> urban residents, <strong>and</strong> 58% <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

residents consume vegetables from <strong>the</strong>ir own gardens (MAPAQ, 1985). The proportion may vary<br />

considerably from one location to ano<strong>the</strong>r. Generally however, it should reflect <strong>the</strong> variations relating to<br />

<strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> environment considered (i.e.,urban, rural or suburban) <strong>and</strong> it is also unlikely that <strong>the</strong>se foods<br />

will be consumed over <strong>the</strong> entire year.<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!