Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME
Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME
Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendix E<br />
C<br />
K<br />
L<br />
V<br />
is <strong>the</strong> climate factor.<br />
is <strong>the</strong> surface roughness.<br />
is <strong>the</strong> maximum unsheltered distance across a site along <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevailing wind.<br />
is <strong>the</strong> vegetative cover factor.<br />
2.3 Modelling<br />
Both <strong>the</strong> above models are empirical, based on a number <strong>of</strong> regression equations between soil loss <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> various soil, climate, <strong>and</strong> management factors that affect it. <strong>Derivation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> input parameters is<br />
difficult <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> WEQ, calculation is also difficult because <strong>of</strong> complex ma<strong>the</strong>matical<br />
relationships between <strong>the</strong> input variables. However, computer models based upon <strong>the</strong>se two equations<br />
are available to calculate erosion losses from basic soil, climate, <strong>and</strong> management data. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most<br />
commonly used is <strong>the</strong> Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator (EPIC) (Williams et al., 1990). Although<br />
EPIC is primarily used to evaluate <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> agricultural practices on soil productivity, its ability to<br />
estimate soil erosions rates (t/ha/y) from basic soil <strong>and</strong> climate data make it a valuable tool <strong>for</strong> evaluating<br />
erosion under o<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>and</strong> use scenarios.<br />
3.0 Deposition<br />
To estimate <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> eroded soil on <strong>of</strong>f-site areas, soil deposition on <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> concern must be<br />
calculated. Although <strong>the</strong> above models are available <strong>for</strong> estimating soil loss by erosion, very little work<br />
has been done on subsequent deposition. Process based models <strong>of</strong> erosion <strong>and</strong> subsequent deposition<br />
are under development but will not be ready <strong>for</strong> application in <strong>the</strong> near future (Foster, 1991).<br />
Deposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eroded material will depend on <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape. In water erosion, most industrial sites<br />
are designed to contain run<strong>of</strong>f within site boundaries <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-site erosion will be minimal. Soil eroded<br />
from those sites without run<strong>of</strong>f controls will move with run<strong>of</strong>f until reaching <strong>the</strong> toe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> slope where it<br />
will be deposited. The area covered by <strong>the</strong> deposited material will depend on local topography. Wind<br />
eroded material will move until encountering a barrier acting as a windbreak or, in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> fine<br />
particles, until removed from suspension by rain.<br />
One can assume that <strong>the</strong> eroded soil leaving a contaminated site will be deposited over an equivalent<br />
area <strong>of</strong>f-site. This soil will be deposited as a surface layer <strong>and</strong> will <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e be immediately available <strong>for</strong><br />
contact. The depth <strong>of</strong> this layer can be calculated from <strong>the</strong> quantity <strong>of</strong> soil deposited over a given area<br />
<strong>and</strong> an assumed bulk density. Some mixing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deposited material with native soil due to traffic,<br />
run<strong>of</strong>f, or gardening will likely occur, diluting <strong>the</strong> contaminated soil. A reasonable surface microrelief is<br />
2 cm <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mixing <strong>of</strong> deposited soil with uncontaminated native soil takes place within this zone. Soil<br />
erosion <strong>and</strong> deposition are on-going processes. However gradual removal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contaminated soil <strong>and</strong><br />
on-going mixing with uncontaminated soil through erosion occurring in o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape<br />
should result in contaminant concentrations reaching an equilibrium over time. In <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> any<br />
procedure <strong>for</strong> accounting <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>se mitigating processes, a period <strong>of</strong> five years was chosen as an<br />
appropriate timeframe <strong>for</strong> contaminants to build up in <strong>the</strong> receiving soil.<br />
4.0 Calculations<br />
4.1 General<br />
153