02.09.2014 Views

Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME

Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME

Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix E<br />

The concentration <strong>of</strong> a contaminant in erosional soil that will raise <strong>the</strong> receiving soil concentration above<br />

a given level can be calculated by assuming a background concentration in <strong>the</strong> receiving soil <strong>and</strong><br />

estimating <strong>the</strong> quantity <strong>of</strong> soil originating from a hypo<strong>the</strong>tical industrial site. With appropriate input<br />

parameters <strong>for</strong> soil, climate, <strong>and</strong> site characteristics, EPIC can estimate <strong>the</strong> quantity <strong>of</strong> soil eroded from<br />

<strong>the</strong> site. Residential/parkl<strong>and</strong>/commercial l<strong>and</strong> use is <strong>the</strong> receiving soil.<br />

4.2 Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator input parameters<br />

A soil with 3% organic carbon <strong>and</strong> a s<strong>and</strong>y loam texture (73% s<strong>and</strong>, 19% silt <strong>and</strong> 8% clay) was chosen<br />

as representative soil susceptible to erosion. A 1 hectare site with 1% slope <strong>and</strong> 650 kg/ha <strong>of</strong><br />

vegetative surface cover was modeled.<br />

Two climate scenarios were run. Climate data from Lethbridge, Alberta was used to estimate potential<br />

erosion where wind is <strong>the</strong> dominant erosive <strong>for</strong>ce. Climatic data from Halifax, Nova Scotia, was used to<br />

simulate erosion where rainfall was <strong>the</strong> dominant <strong>for</strong>ce. EPIC estimated <strong>the</strong> following losses over a five<br />

year period:<br />

Soil Lost by Erosion (t/ha)<br />

154<br />

Site Wind Water Total<br />

Lethbridge 13.2 3.3 16.5<br />

Halifax 0.0 11.3 11.3<br />

The two values were averaged to produce an estimated loss by erosion <strong>of</strong> 13.9 t/ha.<br />

Assuming a bulk density <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> eroded material <strong>of</strong> 1 t/m 3 <strong>and</strong> a depositional area equal to <strong>the</strong> source<br />

area, <strong>the</strong> depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deposited material (D d ) can be evaluated to 0.14 cm using:<br />

where<br />

D d = E/(? b × 10 2 ) [1]<br />

E is <strong>the</strong> mass <strong>of</strong> deposited material = 13.9 t/ha<br />

? b is <strong>the</strong> bulk density = 1 t/m 3<br />

Assuming a bulk density <strong>of</strong> 1 t/m 3 <strong>for</strong> receiving soil <strong>and</strong> a mixing depth <strong>of</strong> 2 cm, <strong>the</strong> final concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> receiving soil after mixing can be calculated by:<br />

Cm = {(2 - D d ) BSC) + (D d × C i )}/2 [2]<br />

where<br />

Cm is <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> contaminant in <strong>the</strong> receiving soil after mixing (µg/g).<br />

BSC is <strong>the</strong> background concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contaminant in <strong>the</strong> receiving soil (µg/g).<br />

C i is <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> contaminant in <strong>the</strong> eroded soil (µg/g).<br />

Substituting <strong>the</strong> value calculated <strong>for</strong> D d in equation [2] <strong>and</strong> replacing C m with SQG R/P/C, that equation<br />

can be rearranged to calculate <strong>the</strong> concentration in soil eroded from <strong>the</strong> industrial site that will raise <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!