Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME
Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME
Protocol for the Derivation of Environmental and Human ... - CCME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendix B<br />
P l<br />
P r<br />
BW<br />
= percent produce purchased<br />
= average chemical concentration in retail produce (mg/kg)<br />
= body weight (kg)<br />
For non-carcinogens, <strong>the</strong> receptor is assumed to be a 13 kg child consuming 125 g <strong>of</strong> produce (i.e.<br />
vegetables) per day. For carcinogens, <strong>the</strong> receptor is assumed to be a 70 kg adult consuming 250 g <strong>of</strong><br />
produce per day (Health Canada, 1994). For residential l<strong>and</strong> use, 10% <strong>of</strong> garden produce consumed is<br />
assumed to be locally grown. For agricultural l<strong>and</strong> use, a 50% value is recommended (Table B.1).<br />
3.0 Bioconcentration <strong>of</strong> Soil Contaminants in Meat <strong>and</strong> Milk <strong>and</strong> Estimated<br />
Daily Intakes<br />
For <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> this general procedure, only direct ingestion <strong>of</strong> soils by beef <strong>and</strong> dairy cattle will be<br />
considered. It is assumed that beef is <strong>the</strong> major type grazing animal consumed by humans. Grazing<br />
animals directly ingest anywhere from 0.4 to 0.9 kg <strong>of</strong> soil per day (McKone <strong>and</strong> Ryan, 1989; Fries<br />
<strong>and</strong> Paustenbach, 1990). Studies demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> lipophilic substances such as PCBs<br />
deposited in or on grazed crops is much less than that taken up through <strong>the</strong> direct ingestion <strong>of</strong> soil by<br />
cattle (Fries <strong>and</strong> Jacobs, 1986). There<strong>for</strong>e indirect contamination via ingestion <strong>of</strong> vegetation is not<br />
considered.<br />
Most dairy <strong>and</strong> beef cattle are fed from harvested <strong>for</strong>age in enclosed feed lots or barns (Paustenbach,<br />
1989). There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> opportunity to ingest soils will be somewhat restricted. However, increasing<br />
consumer dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> "organically grown" meat <strong>and</strong> dairy products from free-range animals increases<br />
<strong>the</strong> likelihood that animals will spend more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir lifetime grazing. The procedure recommended by <strong>the</strong><br />
Subcommitee assumes that an animal is free range <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year.<br />
3.1 Bioconcentration <strong>of</strong> Contaminants in Meat<br />
Travois <strong>and</strong> Arms (1988) have studied <strong>the</strong> bioaccumulation potential <strong>of</strong> organic contaminants into beef<br />
<strong>and</strong> developed <strong>the</strong> following model:<br />
Where <strong>the</strong> biotransfer factor <strong>for</strong> beef (B p ) is defined as:<br />
log B p = - 7.6 + log K ow , n = 36, r = 0.81 [4]<br />
B p = concentration in beef (fresh weight: mg/kg)<br />
daily intake <strong>of</strong> chemical (mg/day)<br />
Assuming that beef cattle ingest, on average, 0.9 kg <strong>of</strong> soil per day (Fries <strong>and</strong> Paustenbach, 1990), <strong>and</strong><br />
that chemical intake with vegetation is negligible compared to that with direct soil intake, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> daily<br />
intake <strong>of</strong> chemical can be defined as:<br />
130